Oregon § 468B.213 Authority of city or county to require setback or buffer for new large confined animal feeding operation

Oregon Statutes

§ 468B.213 — Authority of city or county to require setback or buffer for new large confined animal feeding operation

Oregon § 468B.213

Vol.13

Title 36AHousing; Lottery and Games; Environment

Ch. 468BWater Quality

This text of Oregon § 468B.213 (Authority of city or county to require setback or buffer for new large confined animal feeding operation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Or. Rev. Stat. § 468B.213 (2026).

Text

Notwithstanding ORS 30.935, 215.253 (1) and 633.738, the governing body of a city or county in which a new large confined animal feeding operation, as defined in ORS 468B.215, is proposed to be located may require the new large confined animal feeding operation to include a setback or buffer, composed of a natural or created vegetative barrier, berm or terrain, in the production area of the new large confined animal feeding operation, if the parcel of land on which the new large confined animal feeding operation would be located is adjacent to a parcel on which:

(1)A residential structure is lawfully sited; or

(2)A structure that was lawfully sited when constructed, but no longer conforms with or is allowed under new or changed land use requirements, is sited.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Notwithstanding ORS 30.935, 215.253 (1) and 633.738, the governing body of a city or county in which a new large confined animal feeding operation, as defined in ORS 468B.215, is proposed to be located may require the new large confined animal feeding operation to include a setback or buffer, composed of a natural or created vegetative barrier, berm or terrain, in the production area of the new large confined animal feeding operation, if the parcel of land on which the new large confined animal feeding operation would be located is adjacent to a parcel on which:
(1) A residential structure is lawfully sited; or
(2) A structure that was lawfully sited when constructed, but no longer conforms with or is allowed under new or changed land use requirements, is sited.