Oklahoma § 63-2-429 Comparative responsibility - Burden and standard of

Oklahoma Statutes

§ 63-2-429 — Comparative responsibility - Burden and standard of

Oklahoma § 63-2-429

Title 63Public Health And Safety

This text of Oklahoma § 63-2-429 (Comparative responsibility - Burden and standard of) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Okla. Stat. tit. 63, § 63-2-429 (2026).

Text

proof. A. An action by an individual drug user is governed by the principles of comparative responsibility. Comparative responsibility attributed to the plaintiff does not bar recovery but diminishes the award of compensatory damages proportionally, according to the measure of responsibility attributed to the plaintiff.

B.The burden of proving the comparative responsibility of the plaintiff is on the defendant, which shall be shown by clear and convincing evidence.

C.Comparative responsibility shall not be attributed to a plaintiff who is not an individual drug user.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

proof. A. An action by an individual drug user is governed by the principles of comparative responsibility. Comparative responsibility attributed to the plaintiff does not bar recovery but diminishes the award of compensatory damages proportionally, according to the measure of responsibility attributed to the plaintiff. B. The burden of proving the comparative responsibility of the plaintiff is on the defendant, which shall be shown by clear and convincing evidence. C. Comparative responsibility shall not be attributed to a plaintiff who is not an individual drug user.