Oklahoma § 22-1406 Action which may be taken by district court after filing

Oklahoma Statutes

§ 22-1406 — Action which may be taken by district court after filing

Oklahoma § 22-1406

Title 22Criminal Procedure

This text of Oklahoma § 22-1406 (Action which may be taken by district court after filing) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Okla. Stat. tit. 22, § 22-1406 (2026).

Text

of indictment of information and hearing. After the filing of an indictment or information by the Attorney General or district attorney and after a hearing with respect to which any person who shall be affected has been given thirty (30) days' notice and opportunity to participate, the district court may, based on the indictment or information and the hearing: 1. Enter a restraining order or injunction; 2. Require the execution of satisfactory bond in the amount of ten percent (10%) of the property value; or 3. Take any other action, including the appointment of a receiver, that the Attorney General or district attorney shows by a preponderance of the evidence is necessary to preserve the property which may be subject to criminal forfeiture.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

of indictment of information and hearing. After the filing of an indictment or information by the Attorney General or district attorney and after a hearing with respect to which any person who shall be affected has been given thirty (30) days' notice and opportunity to participate, the district court may, based on the indictment or information and the hearing: 1. Enter a restraining order or injunction; 2. Require the execution of satisfactory bond in the amount of ten percent (10%) of the property value; or 3. Take any other action, including the appointment of a receiver, that the Attorney General or district attorney shows by a preponderance of the evidence is necessary to preserve the property which may be subject to criminal forfeiture.