Nevada § 645H.730 Knowledge of associate or employer of violation by asset management company or asset manager; penalties

Nevada Statutes

§ 645H.730 — Knowledge of associate or employer of violation by asset management company or asset manager; penalties

Nevada § 645H.730

Title 54PROFESSIONS, OCCUPATIONS AND BUSINESSES

Ch. 645HAsset

DISCIPLINARY AND OTHER ACTIONS

This text of Nevada § 645H.730 (Knowledge of associate or employer of violation by asset management company or asset manager; penalties) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 645H.730 (2026).

Text

1.Any unlawful act or violation of any of the provisions of this chapter by any asset management company or asset manager is not cause to suspend, revoke or deny the renewal of the certificate of registration or permit of an asset management company or asset manager associated with an asset management company or asset manager, unless it appears to the satisfaction of the Division that the associate knew or should have known thereof. A course of dealing shown to have been persistently and consistently followed by any asset management company or asset manager constitutes prima facie evidence of such knowledge upon the part of the associate.

2.If it appears that a registered asset management company knew or should have known of any unlawful act or violation on the part of an asset manager e

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

1. Any unlawful act or violation of any of the provisions of this chapter by any asset management company or asset manager is not cause to suspend, revoke or deny the renewal of the certificate of registration or permit of an asset management company or asset manager associated with an asset management company or asset manager, unless it appears to the satisfaction of the Division that the associate knew or should have known thereof. A course of dealing shown to have been persistently and consistently followed by any asset management company or asset manager constitutes prima facie evidence of such knowledge upon the part of the associate.
2. If it appears that a registered asset management company knew or should have known of any unlawful act or violation on the part of an asset manager employed by the asset management company, in the course of his or her employment, the Division may suspend, revoke or deny the renewal of the certificate of registration of the asset management company and may assess a civil penalty of not more than $5,000.
3. The Division may suspend, revoke or deny the renewal of the certificate of registration of an asset management company and may assess a civil penalty of not more than $5,000 against the asset management company if it appears that the asset management company has failed to maintain adequate supervision of an asset manager associated with the asset management company and that asset manager commits any unlawful act or violates any provision of this chapter.