Nevada Statutes
§ 50.115 — Mode and order of interrogation and presentation
1. The judge shall exercise reasonable control over the mode and order of interrogating witnesses and presenting evidence:
(a)To make the interrogation and presentation effective for the ascertainment of the truth;
(b)To avoid needless consumption of time; and
(c)To protect witnesses from undue harassment or embarrassment.
2. Cross-examination is limited to the subject matter of the direct examination and matters affecting the credibility of the witness, unless the judge in the exercise of discretion permits inquiry into additional matters as if on direct examination.
3. Except as provided in subsection 4:
(a)Leading questions may not be used on the direct examination of a witness without the permission of the court.
(b)Leading questions are permitted on cross-examination.
4. Except t
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Nevada § 50.115 (Mode and order of interrogation and presentation) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Jeremias v. State
412 P.3d 43 (Nevada Supreme Court, 2018)
Leonard v. State
17 P.3d 397 (Nevada Supreme Court, 2001)
Manley v. State
979 P.2d 703 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1999)
Burns v. State
618 P.2d 881 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1980)
SENA (CHRISTOPHER) v. STATE
2022 NV 34 (Nevada Supreme Court, 2022)
Lopez v. Lopez
541 P.3d 117 (Court of Appeals of Nevada, 2023)
Colvin (Michael) v. State
(Nevada Supreme Court, 2016)
Eric L. Dale v. Brian E. Williams, et al.
(D. Nevada, 2025)
Gray (Schemaj) Vs. State
477 P.3d 364 (Nevada Supreme Court, 2020)
JEREMIAS (RALPH) VS. STATE (DEATH PENALTY-DIRECT)
2018 NV 8 (Nevada Supreme Court, 2018)
Lopez v. Lopez
(Nevada Supreme Court, 2023)
Renteria-Novoa v. Williams
(D. Nevada, 2025)
Legislative History
(Added to NRS by 1971, 789 ; A 1979, 24 )