Nevada Statutes
§ 49.115 — Exceptions
There is no privilege under NRS 49.095 or 49.105:
1.If the services of the lawyer were sought or obtained to enable or aid anyone to commit or plan to commit what the client knew or reasonably should have known to be a crime or fraud.
2.As to a communication relevant to an issue between parties who claim through the same deceased client, regardless of whether the claims are by testate or intestate succession or by inter vivos transaction.
3.As to a communication relevant to an issue of breach of duty by the lawyer to his or her client or by the client to his or her lawyer.
4.As to a communication relevant to an issue concerning an attested document to which the lawyer is an attesting witness.
5.As to a communication relevant to a matter of common interest between two or more clients i
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Nevada § 49.115 (Exceptions) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Montgomery v. eTreppid Technologies, LLc
548 F. Supp. 2d 1175 (D. Nevada, 2008)
CANARELLI VS. DIST. CT. (CANARELLI)
2020 NV 29 (Nevada Supreme Court, 2020)
Hall CA-NV, LLC v. Ladera Development LLC
(D. Nevada, 2019)
Paradise Entertainment Limited, et al. v. Empire Technological Group Limited, et al.
(D. Nevada, 2025)
Seibel v. Eighth Jud. Dist. Ct.
2022 NV 73 (Nevada Supreme Court, 2022)
TOWER HOMES, LLC VS. HEATON
2016 NV 62 (Nevada Supreme Court, 2016)
Valley Health Sys., L.L.C. v. Dist. Ct. (Bellavance)
(Nevada Supreme Court, 2022)
Legislative History
(Added to NRS by 1971, 783 )
Nearby Sections
15
§ 49.035
Definitions§ 49.045
“Client” defined§ 49.055
“Confidential” defined§ 49.065
“Lawyer” defined§ 49.095
General rule of privilege§ 49.105
Who may claim privilege§ 49.115
Exceptions§ 49.117
“Review committee” defined§ 49.119
General rule of privilege§ 49.121
Who may claim privilege