Nevada Statutes
§ 48.035 — Exclusion of relevant evidence on grounds of prejudice, confusion or waste of time
1.Although relevant, evidence is not admissible if its probative value is substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice, of confusion of the issues or of misleading the jury.
2.Although relevant, evidence may be excluded if its probative value is substantially outweighed by considerations of undue delay, waste of time or needless presentation of cumulative evidence.
3.Evidence of another act or crime which is so closely related to an act in controversy or a crime charged that an ordinary witness cannot describe the act in controversy or the crime charged without referring to the other act or crime shall not be excluded, but at the request of an interested party, a cautionary instruction shall be given explaining the reason for its admission.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Nevada § 48.035 (Exclusion of relevant evidence on grounds of prejudice, confusion or waste of time) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Chowdhry v. NLVH, INC.
851 P.2d 459 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1993)
Butler v. State
102 P.3d 71 (Nevada Supreme Court, 2004)
Bushnell v. State
599 P.2d 1038 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1979)
Berner v. State
765 P.2d 1144 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1988)
American Elevator Co. v. Briscoe
572 P.2d 534 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1977)
CHAPARRO (OSBALDO) VS. STATE
2021 NV 68 (Nevada Supreme Court, 2021)
Brannan v. Nevada Rock & Sand Co.
823 P.2d 291 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1992)
Aberha v. Williams
(D. Nevada, 2023)
ABID VS. ABID (CHILD CUSTODY)
2017 NV 94 (Nevada Supreme Court, 2017)
ACOSTA (XAVIER) v. STATE
141 Nev. Adv. Op. No. 40 (Nevada Supreme Court, 2025)
Ahearn (Jamison) v. State
(Nevada Supreme Court, 2016)
Alfaro v. State
(Nevada Supreme Court, 2023)
Bailey v. Bean
(D. Nevada, 2025)
Banderos (Jose) v. State
(Nevada Supreme Court, 2019)
Belcher (Kevin) v. State
(Nevada Supreme Court, 2022)
Brass v. Williams
(D. Nevada, 2020)
BROWN (LARRY) v. STATE
2022 NV 44 (Nevada Supreme Court, 2022)
CARROLL (DEANGELO) VS. STATE
2016 NV 23 (Nevada Supreme Court, 2016)
Legislative History
(Added to NRS by 1971, 780 ; A 1979, 37 )
Nearby Sections
15
§ 48.015
“Relevant evidence” defined§ 48.039
Testimony of witness who previously underwent hypnosis to recall subject matter of testimony§ 48.055
Methods of proving character§ 48.059
Habit; routine practice§ 48.061
Effects of domestic violence§ 48.095
Subsequent remedial measures§ 48.105
Compromise; offers to compromise