Nevada Statutes
§ 47.200 — Determination on evidence of presumed fact: Where basic facts established
When reasonable minds would necessarily agree that the evidence renders the existence of the basic facts more probable than not, but direct evidence is introduced contrary to the existence of the presumed fact, the question of the existence of the presumed fact is determined as follows:
1.If reasonable minds would necessarily agree that the direct evidence renders the nonexistence of the presumed fact more probable than not, the judge shall direct the jury to find against the existence of the presumed fact.
2.If reasonable minds would necessarily agree that the direct evidence does not render the nonexistence of the presumed fact more probable than not, the judge shall direct the jury to find in favor of the presumed fact.
3.If reasonable minds would not necessarily agree as to whether
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Nevada § 47.200 (Determination on evidence of presumed fact: Where basic facts established) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Res. Grp., LLC v. Nev. Ass'n Servs., Inc.
437 P.3d 154 (Nevada Supreme Court, 2019)
JARAMILLO VS. RAMOS, M.D.
2020 NV 17 (Nevada Supreme Court, 2020)
RESOURCES GRP., LLC VS. NEVADA ASS'N SERV.'S, INC.
2019 NV 8 (Nevada Supreme Court, 2019)
Legislative History
(Added to NRS by 1971, 778 )
Nearby Sections
15
§ 47.020
Scope of title 4 of NRS§ 47.030
Purposes of title 4 of NRS§ 47.100
Weight and credibility§ 47.110
Limited admissibility§ 47.130
Matters of fact§ 47.140
Matters of law§ 47.160
Opportunity to be heard