Nevada Statutes
§ 47.190 — Determination on evidence of basic facts
When a presumption is made conclusive by statute or no direct evidence is introduced contrary to the existence of the presumed fact, the question of the existence of the presumed fact depends upon the existence of the basic facts and is determined as follows:
1.If reasonable minds would necessarily agree that the evidence renders the existence of the basic facts more probable than not, the judge shall direct the jury to find in favor of the existence of the presumed fact.
2.If reasonable minds would necessarily agree that the evidence does not render the existence of the basic facts more probable than not, the judge shall direct the jury to find against the existence of the presumed fact.
3.If reasonable minds would not necessarily agree as to whether the evidence renders the existence
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Nevada § 47.190 (Determination on evidence of basic facts) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Legislative History
(Added to NRS by 1971, 777 )
Nearby Sections
15
§ 47.020
Scope of title 4 of NRS§ 47.030
Purposes of title 4 of NRS§ 47.100
Weight and credibility§ 47.110
Limited admissibility§ 47.130
Matters of fact§ 47.140
Matters of law§ 47.160
Opportunity to be heard