Nevada Statutes
§ 3.220 — Equal coextensive and concurrent jurisdiction
The district judges shall possess equal coextensive and concurrent jurisdiction and power. They each shall have power to hold court in any county of this State. They each shall exercise and perform the powers, duties and functions of the court and of judges thereof and of judges at chambers. The decision in an action or proceeding may be written or signed at any place in the State by the judge who acted on the trial and may be forwarded to and filed by the clerk, who shall thereupon enter judgment as directed in the decision, or judgment may be rendered in open court, and, if so rendered, shall be entered by the clerk accordingly. If the public business requires, each judge may try causes and transact judicial business in the same county at the same time. Each judge shall have power to tra
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Nevada § 3.220 (Equal coextensive and concurrent jurisdiction) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Halverson v. Hardcastle
163 P.3d 428 (Nevada Supreme Court, 2007)
Mainor v. Nault
101 P.3d 308 (Nevada Supreme Court, 2004)
Rohlfing v. Second Judicial District Court
803 P.2d 659 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1990)
State v. Sustacha
826 P.2d 959 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1992)
De La Cruz v. Dufresne
533 F. Supp. 145 (D. Nevada, 1982)
Zabeti v. State
96 P.3d 773 (Nevada Supreme Court, 2004)
Landreth v. Malik
221 P.3d 1265 (Nevada Supreme Court, 2009)
Walker v. REYNOLDS ELECTRICAL AND ENGINEERING CO.
468 P.2d 1 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1970)
Holland v. Anthony L. Barney, Ltd.
540 P.3d 1074 (Court of Appeals of Nevada, 2023)
GUZMAN (WILBER) VS. DIST. CT. (STATE)
2020 NV 12 (Nevada Supreme Court, 2020)
Holland v. Anthony L. Barney
(Nevada Supreme Court, 2023)
Holland v. Anthony L. Barney, Ltd.
(Nevada Supreme Court, 2023)
Legislative History
[1:59:1895; C § 2573; RL § 4922; NCL § 8469]