Nevada Statutes

§ 280.201 — Plan for apportionment of expenses: Exclusions; formula for apportionment; tax ad valorem; statistics and records

Nevada § 280.201
JurisdictionNevada
Title 22COOPERATIVE AGREEMENTS BY PUBLIC AGENCIES; REGIONAL
Ch. 280Metropolitan
FINANCES

This text of Nevada § 280.201 (Plan for apportionment of expenses: Exclusions; formula for apportionment; tax ad valorem; statistics and records) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Nev. Rev. Stat. § 280.201 (2026).

Text

1. The funding apportionment plan must exclude the cost of:

(a)Operating and maintaining a county or a branch county jail;
(b)A rural program of resident officers, where applicable; and
(c)Any program of contract services which is totally funded by the contracting agency or entity. Ê The costs described in paragraphs (a) and (b) are a proper charge against the county. The capital costs of building a county or a branch county jail are the responsibility of the board of county commissioners. 2. If a department operates a program for school crossing guards, each participating political subdivision must pay the cost of operating the positions located within its jurisdiction. 3. The funding apportionment plan must apportion the anticipated costs of operating and maintaining the department, a

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

County of Clark Ex Rel. Dondero v. City of Las Vegas Ex Rel. Briare
628 P.2d 1120 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1981)
10 case citations

Legislative History

(Added to NRS by 1977, 363 ; A 1979, 1002 ; 1981, 638 ; 1987, 1493 ; 1997, 2876 )

Nearby Sections

15
View on official source ↗

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Nevada § 280.201, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/nv/280.201.