JurisdictionNevadaTitle 13GUARDIANSHIPS; CONSERVATORSHIPS; TRUSTS
Ch. 159Guardianship
COMMUNICATION, VISITATION AND INTERACTION BETWEEN PROTECTED
PERSONS AND RELATIVES OR PERSONS OF NATURAL AFFECTION
This text of Nevada § 159.334 (Imposition of certain restrictions on communication, visitation or interaction between protected person and relative or person of natural affection before issuance of order) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
1. Before issuing an order pursuant to NRS 159.333 , a court shall consider imposing any restrictions on communication, visitation or interaction between a protected person and a relative or person of natural affection in the following order of preference:
(a)Placing reasonable time, manner or place restrictions on communication, visitation or interaction between the protected person and the relative or person of natural affection based on the history between the protected person and the relative or person of natural affection or the wishes of the protected person;
(b)Requiring that any communication, visitation or interaction between the protected person and the relative or person of natural affection be supervised; and
(c)Denying communication, visitation or interaction between the pr
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
1. Before issuing an order pursuant to NRS 159.333 , a court shall consider imposing any restrictions on communication, visitation or interaction between a protected person and a relative or person of natural affection in the following order of preference:
(a) Placing reasonable time, manner or place restrictions on communication, visitation or interaction between the protected person and the relative or person of natural affection based on the history between the protected person and the relative or person of natural affection or the wishes of the protected person;
(b) Requiring that any communication, visitation or interaction between the protected person and the relative or person of natural affection be supervised; and
(c) Denying communication, visitation or interaction between the protected person and the relative or person of natural affection.
2. If the court determines that the relative or person of natural affection poses a threat to the protected person, the court may order supervised communication, visitation or interaction pursuant to paragraph (b) of subsection 1 before denying any communication, visitation or interaction.