Nevada Statutes
§ 133.170 — Omission of child or grandchild presumed intentional; rights of child or grandchild if omission found unintentional
Nevada § 133.170
JurisdictionNevada
Title 12WILLS AND ESTATES OF DECEASED PERSONS
Ch. 133Wills
KINDRED NOT MENTIONED IN WILL WHO SHARE IN ESTATE
This text of Nevada § 133.170 (Omission of child or grandchild presumed intentional; rights of child or grandchild if omission found unintentional) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Nev. Rev. Stat. § 133.170 (2026).
Text
When the child of a testator or the issue of a deceased child of a testator is omitted from the testator’s will, it must be presumed that the omission was intentional. Should the court find that the omission was unintentional, the child, or the issue of the deceased child, is entitled to the same share in the estate of the testator as if the testator had died intestate.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Legislative History
[15:61:1862; B § 826; BH § 3014; C § 3085; RL § 6216; NCL § 9919]—(NRS A 1957, 155 ; 1999, 2258 )
Nearby Sections
15
§ 133.020
Sound mind; age§ 133.045
Disposition of certain tangible personal property by reference to list or statement; requirements§ 133.060
Devise to subscribing witness§ 133.070
Creditors as witnesses§ 133.080
Foreign execution§ 133.085
Electronic will§ 133.090
Holographic will§ 133.100
Nuncupative or oral will invalidCite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
Nevada § 133.170, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/nv/133.170.