Nevada Statutes

§ 133.170 — Omission of child or grandchild presumed intentional; rights of child or grandchild if omission found unintentional

Nevada § 133.170
JurisdictionNevada
Title 12WILLS AND ESTATES OF DECEASED PERSONS
Ch. 133Wills
KINDRED NOT MENTIONED IN WILL WHO SHARE IN ESTATE

This text of Nevada § 133.170 (Omission of child or grandchild presumed intentional; rights of child or grandchild if omission found unintentional) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Nev. Rev. Stat. § 133.170 (2026).

Text

When the child of a testator or the issue of a deceased child of a testator is omitted from the testator’s will, it must be presumed that the omission was intentional. Should the court find that the omission was unintentional, the child, or the issue of the deceased child, is entitled to the same share in the estate of the testator as if the testator had died intestate.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Legislative History

[15:61:1862; B § 826; BH § 3014; C § 3085; RL § 6216; NCL § 9919]—(NRS A 1957, 155 ; 1999, 2258 )

Nearby Sections

15
View on official source ↗

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Nevada § 133.170, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/nv/133.170.