Nevada § 133.160 Rights of child born after making of will by parent of child; effect of such rights on remaining provisions of will

Nevada Statutes

§ 133.160 — Rights of child born after making of will by parent of child; effect of such rights on remaining provisions of will

Nevada § 133.160

Title 12WILLS AND ESTATES OF DECEASED PERSONS

Ch. 133Wills

KINDRED NOT MENTIONED IN WILL WHO SHARE IN ESTATE

This text of Nevada § 133.160 (Rights of child born after making of will by parent of child; effect of such rights on remaining provisions of will) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 133.160 (2026).

Text

1. When a child is born after the making of a will by a parent of that child and no provision is made for the child in the will, the child is entitled to the same share in the estate of the testator as if the testator had died intestate, unless:

(a)It is apparent from the will that it was the intention of the testator that no provision should be made for that child; or

(b)The testator provided for the omitted child by a transfer of property outside of the will and it appears that the testator intended the transfer to be in lieu of a testamentary provision. 2. If, pursuant to subsection 1, a child is entitled to take the same share in the estate of the testator as if the testator had died intestate, the remaining provisions of the will remain intact to the extent those provisions are not

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

1. When a child is born after the making of a will by a parent of that child and no provision is made for the child in the will, the child is entitled to the same share in the estate of the testator as if the testator had died intestate, unless:
(a) It is apparent from the will that it was the intention of the testator that no provision should be made for that child; or
(b) The testator provided for the omitted child by a transfer of property outside of the will and it appears that the testator intended the transfer to be in lieu of a testamentary provision.
2. If, pursuant to subsection 1, a child is entitled to take the same share in the estate of the testator as if the testator had died intestate, the remaining provisions of the will remain intact to the extent those provisions are not inconsistent with this subsection, including, without limitation, any provision concerning the appointment of a personal representative.