New Mexico § 30-43-3 Making extortionate extensions of credit

New Mexico Statutes

§ 30-43-3 — Making extortionate extensions of credit

New Mexico § 30-43-3

Ch. 30Criminal Offenses

Art. 43Loan Sharking

This text of New Mexico § 30-43-3 (Making extortionate extensions of credit) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New Mexico primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

N.M. Stat. Ann. § 30-43-3 (2026).

Text

A. Any person who makes or conspires or attempts to make an extortionate extension of credit is guilty of a third degree felony. B. In any prosecution pursuant to this section, if it is shown that all of the following factors were present in connection with the extension of credit, there is prima facie evidence that the extension of credit was extortionate:

(1)the extension of credit was made at a rate of interest in excess of an annual rate of forty-five percent calculated according to the actuarial method of allocating payments on a debt between principal and interest, pursuant to which a payment is applied first to the accumulated interest and the balance is applied to the unpaid principal;

(2)at the time the extension of credit was made, the debtor reasonably believed either of the f

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

A. Any person who makes or conspires or attempts to make an extortionate extension of credit is guilty of a third degree felony. B. In any prosecution pursuant to this section, if it is shown that all of the following factors were present in connection with the extension of credit, there is prima facie evidence that the extension of credit was extortionate: (1) the extension of credit was made at a rate of interest in excess of an annual rate of forty-five percent calculated according to the actuarial method of allocating payments on a debt between principal and interest, pursuant to which a payment is applied first to the accumulated interest and the balance is applied to the unpaid principal; (2) at the time the extension of credit was made, the debtor reasonably believed either of the following: (a) one or more extensions of credit by the creditor had been collected by extortionate means or the nonrepayment had been punished by extortionate means; or (b) the creditor had a reputation for the use of extortionate means to collect extensions of credit or to punish the nonrepayment thereof; and (3) upon the making of the extension of credit, the total of the extensions of credit by the creditor to the debtor then outstanding, including any unpaid interest or similar charges, exceeded one hundred dollars ($100). C. In any prosecution pursuant to this section, if evidence has been introduced tending to show the existence of the circumstances described in Paragraph (1) of Subsection B of this section and direct evidence of the actual belief of the debtor as to the creditor's collection practices is not available, then for the purpose of showing the understanding of the debtor and the creditor at the time the extension of credit was made, the court may, pursuant to the New Mexico rules of evidence, in its discretion allow evidence to be introduced tending to show the reputation as to collection practices of the creditor in any community of which the debtor was a member at the time of the extension. D. Nothing contained in Paragraphs (1) through (3) of Subsection B of this section shall be construed as a requirement for the proof of the existence of an extortionate extension of credit.