evidence required. A. A credible allegation of fraud determination by the department shall be deemed a final agency decision and may be appealed pursuant to Section 39-3-1.1 NMSA 1978. B. A medicaid provider or subcontractor that is the subject of a referral to the attorney general for further investigation based on a credible allegation of fraud may seek judicial review, pursuant to Section 39-3-1.1 NMSA 1978, of the department's determination that the allegation of fraud is credible. The department shall show by substantial evidence that:
(1)it has followed its own procedures; and (2) the evidence relied upon to make its credible allegation of fraud determination was relevant, credible and material to the issue of fraud. C. In a proceeding for judicial review under this section, the rev
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
evidence required. A. A credible allegation of fraud determination by the department shall be deemed a final agency decision and may be appealed pursuant to Section 39-3-1.1 NMSA 1978. B. A medicaid provider or subcontractor that is the subject of a referral to the attorney general for further investigation based on a credible allegation of fraud may seek judicial review, pursuant to Section 39-3-1.1 NMSA 1978, of the department's determination that the allegation of fraud is credible. The department shall show by substantial evidence that: (1) it has followed its own procedures; and (2) the evidence relied upon to make its credible allegation of fraud determination was relevant, credible and material to the issue of fraud. C. In a proceeding for judicial review under this section, the reviewing court shall not consider evidence acquired by the department after making its credible allegation of fraud determination.