New Mexico § 27-11-16 Credible allegation of fraud; judicial review; substantial

New Mexico Statutes

§ 27-11-16 — Credible allegation of fraud; judicial review; substantial

New Mexico § 27-11-16

Ch. 27Public Assistance

Art. 11Medicaid Providers

This text of New Mexico § 27-11-16 (Credible allegation of fraud; judicial review; substantial) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New Mexico primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

N.M. Stat. Ann. § 27-11-16 (2026).

Text

evidence required. A. A credible allegation of fraud determination by the department shall be deemed a final agency decision and may be appealed pursuant to Section 39-3-1.1 NMSA 1978. B. A medicaid provider or subcontractor that is the subject of a referral to the attorney general for further investigation based on a credible allegation of fraud may seek judicial review, pursuant to Section 39-3-1.1 NMSA 1978, of the department's determination that the allegation of fraud is credible. The department shall show by substantial evidence that:

(1)it has followed its own procedures; and (2) the evidence relied upon to make its credible allegation of fraud determination was relevant, credible and material to the issue of fraud. C. In a proceeding for judicial review under this section, the rev

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

evidence required. A. A credible allegation of fraud determination by the department shall be deemed a final agency decision and may be appealed pursuant to Section 39-3-1.1 NMSA 1978. B. A medicaid provider or subcontractor that is the subject of a referral to the attorney general for further investigation based on a credible allegation of fraud may seek judicial review, pursuant to Section 39-3-1.1 NMSA 1978, of the department's determination that the allegation of fraud is credible. The department shall show by substantial evidence that: (1) it has followed its own procedures; and (2) the evidence relied upon to make its credible allegation of fraud determination was relevant, credible and material to the issue of fraud. C. In a proceeding for judicial review under this section, the reviewing court shall not consider evidence acquired by the department after making its credible allegation of fraud determination.