3.Notwithstanding the provisions of P.L.1981, c.262 (C.58:1A-1 et al.) or any other law, rule or regulation to the contrary, for a period not to exceed 10 years following the effective date of P.L.1993, c.202 (C.58:1A-7.3 et al.), the authority of the department to modify the conditions of an existing diversion permit issued or water usage certification approved pursuant to section 6 of P.L.1981, c.262 (C.58:1A-6) within the area designated and established by the department as Water Supply Critical Area II shall be limited as hereinafter provided: a. No existing diversion permit or water usage certification shall be reduced to an amount less than that withdrawn from the Depleted and Threatened Zone in 1991 or that specified through application of the formulas set forth as follows, whichev
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
3. Notwithstanding the provisions of P.L.1981, c.262 (C.58:1A-1 et al.) or any other law, rule or regulation to the contrary, for a period not to exceed 10 years following the effective date of P.L.1993, c.202 (C.58:1A-7.3 et al.), the authority of the department to modify the conditions of an existing diversion permit issued or water usage certification approved pursuant to section 6 of P.L.1981, c.262 (C.58:1A-6) within the area designated and established by the department as Water Supply Critical Area II shall be limited as hereinafter provided: a. No existing diversion permit or water usage certification shall be reduced to an amount less than that withdrawn from the Depleted and Threatened Zone in 1991 or that specified through application of the formulas set forth as follows, whichever is less: (1) Depleted Zone base allocations: DZ = (0.65 x D83) + (Dmax - D83) where: DZ = Depleted Zone base allocation issued to a person and expressed in million gallons per year (MGY); D83 = A person's total Annual Potomac-Raritan-Magothy aquifer system (PRM) withdrawal from the Depleted Zone in MGY in 1983; and Dmax = A person's total Annual PRM withdrawal from the Depleted Zone in any year between 1983 and 1991 in MGY. The calculation of the Depleted Zone base allocation shall be based on the selection of one year for each affected permittee. (2) Threatened Zone base allocations: The Threatened Zone base allocation shall be equal to the maximum annual withdrawal from the Threatened Zone in any year between 1983 and 1991 in MGY. In the case of those permittees with diversion permits for Depleted Zone and Threatened Zone withdrawals, the same year shall be used to calculate Depleted Zone allocations and Threatened Zone allocations. The allocation for continued withdrawals for those industrial users whose withdrawals in 1991 were less than that withdrawn in any year between 1983 and 1990 due to economic conditions shall be calculated based upon the Depleted Zone and Threatened Zone formulas set forth in paragraphs (1) and (2) of this subsection and shall not be limited to the amount withdrawn in 1991. In the calculation of revised PRM diversion permit withdrawal levels, the department shall consider the permittee's historic water use from the Depleted Zone and Threatened Zone. The allocation represented by one-half of the difference between the total PRM allocation based upon the formula set forth in this subsection and the total 1991 withdrawal shall be designated as water allocation credits pursuant to section 5 of P.L.1993, c.202 (C.58:1A-7.4). These credits shall be available for transfer to areas designated for growth within the Water Allocation Credit Receiving Area as defined in subsection b. of this section. b. Within the area designated and established by the department as Water Supply Critical Area II, those areas: (1) north of the Rancocas Creek from its confluence with the Delaware River to the intersection of the southwest branch of the Rancocas Creek with State Route 38; (2) north of State Route 38 to the start of County Route 530; and (3) north of County Route 530 to the intersection of County Route 530 and State Route 70 near the Burlington-Ocean county boundary, shall be recognized as a Water Allocation Credit Receiving Area. The department shall not unreasonably withhold approval for the transfer of water allocation credits for local use only within this area unless it can be demonstrated that the withdrawals will result in a significant adverse impact on the aquifer system. The department shall not unreasonably withhold approval of a permit modification seeking an increase in allocation where the permittee has obtained water allocation credits in an amount equal to the requested increase in withdrawal. The areas described in paragraphs (1), (2) and (3) of this subsection shall be recognized as a Water Allocation Credit Receiving Area because hydrogeologic studies have shown that increased withdrawals from the PRM may be possible in this portion of the acquifer system without adverse impacts. Permittees within this area may receive water allocation credits and water conservation credits. Water conservation credits shall be granted to any permittee in the Water Allocation Credit Receiving Area who can demonstrate a net reduction in annual water use over the 13-year period from 1978 through 1991, inclusive. The water conservation credits shall be equal to 50% of the difference between the maximum year withdrawal during this period and 1991, where the reduction can be documented as attributable to water conservation. The department shall approve the diversion permit modification to reflect the water conservation credits granted. Permittees that have established water supply system interconnections in order to develop alternate supplies pursuant to an administrative order issued by the department prior to the effective date of P.L.1993, c.202 (C.58:1A-7.3 et al.) shall have the continuing right to transfer water through the interconnection if the diversion permitted under subsection a. of this section provides for the withdrawal that exceeds the needs of the users of the suppliers' system exclusive of the interconnection. The supplier of an interconnected system shall have the right to obtain water allocation credits in an amount that would allow transfer of additional volumes through the interconnection provided that such additional volume does not exceed 50% of the volume transferred through the interconnection in 1991. c. As used in this section, the boundary of the designated Water Supply Critical Area II corresponds to the average potentiometric contour 30 feet below sea level for the Potomac-Raritan-Magothy Aquifer as published in Water Levels in Major Artesian Aquifers of the New Jersey Coastal Plain, Water Resources Investigations Report 86-4028 of the United States Department of the Interior Geological Survey, 1983, and the surrounding margin area. L.1993,c.202,s.3.