New Jersey § 56:15-3 Actual, threatened misappropriation may be enjoined.

New Jersey Statutes

§ 56:15-3 — Actual, threatened misappropriation may be enjoined.

New Jersey § 56:15-3

Title 56TRADE NAMES, TRADE-MARKS AND UNFAIR TRADE PRACTICES

This text of New Jersey § 56:15-3 (Actual, threatened misappropriation may be enjoined.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

N.J. Stat. Ann. § 56:15-3 (2026).

Text

3.

a.Actual or threatened misappropriation may be enjoined. Upon application to the court, an injunction shall be terminated when the trade secret has ceased to exist, but the injunction may be continued for an additional reasonable period of time in order to eliminate commercial advantage that otherwise would be derived from the misappropriation.

b.In exceptional circumstances, an injunction may condition future use upon payment of a reasonable royalty for no longer than the period of time for which use could have been prohibited. Exceptional circumstances include, but are not limited to, a material and prejudicial change of position prior to acquiring knowledge or reason to know of misappropriation that renders a prohibitive injunction inequitable.

c.In appropriate circumstances, affi

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

3. a. Actual or threatened misappropriation may be enjoined. Upon application to the court, an injunction shall be terminated when the trade secret has ceased to exist, but the injunction may be continued for an additional reasonable period of time in order to eliminate commercial advantage that otherwise would be derived from the misappropriation. b. In exceptional circumstances, an injunction may condition future use upon payment of a reasonable royalty for no longer than the period of time for which use could have been prohibited. Exceptional circumstances include, but are not limited to, a material and prejudicial change of position prior to acquiring knowledge or reason to know of misappropriation that renders a prohibitive injunction inequitable. c. In appropriate circumstances, affirmative acts to protect a trade secret may be compelled by court order. L.2011, c.161, s.3.