Nebraska Statutes

§ 77-1359 — Agricultural and horticultural land; legislative findings; terms, defined

Nebraska § 77-1359
JurisdictionNebraska
Ch. 77Revenue and Taxation

This text of Nebraska § 77-1359 (Agricultural and horticultural land; legislative findings; terms, defined) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nebraska primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Neb. Rev. Stat. § 77-1359 (2026).

Text

The Legislature finds and declares that agricultural land and horticultural land shall be a separate and distinct class of real property for purposes of assessment. The assessed value of agricultural land and horticultural land shall not be uniform and proportionate with all other real property, but the assessed value shall be uniform and proportionate within the class of agricultural land and horticultural land. For purposes of this section and section 77-1363 :

(1)(a) Agricultural land and horticultural land means a parcel of land, excluding land associated with a building or enclosed structure located on the parcel, which is primarily used for agricultural or horticultural purposes, including wasteland lying in or adjacent to and in common ownership or management with other agricultura

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Krings v. Garfield Cty. Bd. of Equal.
835 N.W.2d 750 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 2013)
20 case citations
Cain v. Custer Cty. Bd. of Equal.
298 Neb. 834 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 2018)
19 case citations
Agena v. Lancaster Cty. Bd. of Equal.
276 Neb. 851 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 2008)
7 case citations
County of Webster v. Nebraska Tax Equal. & Rev. Comm.
296 Neb. 751 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 2017)
6 case citations
Fountain II v. Douglas Cty. Bd. of Equal.
999 N.W.2d 135 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 2024)
6 case citations
Burdess v. Washington Cty. Bd. of Equal.
298 Neb. 166 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 2017)
2 case citations
Lancaster Cty. Bd. of Equal. v. Moser
312 Neb. 757 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 2022)
1 case citations

Legislative History

Source: Laws 1985, LB 271, § 4; Laws 1986, LB 817, § 11; Laws 1988, LB 1207, § 3; Laws 1989, LB 361, § 14; Laws 1991, LB 320, § 7; Laws 1996, LB 934, § 3; Laws 1997, LB 270, § 77; Laws 2000, LB 419, § 1; Laws 2006, LB 808, § 35; Laws 2008, LB777, § 1; Laws 2012, LB750, § 1; Laws 2017, LB217, § 6; Laws 2024, LB1317, § 78. Cross References: Conservation and Preservation Easements Act, see section 76-2,118. Annotations: A property is primarily used for agricultural purposes if it is predominantly or mainly used for agricultural purposes. Fountain II v. Douglas Cty. Bd. of Equal., 315 Neb. 633, 999 N.W.2d 135 (2024). Taking steps to develop a property, including filing preliminary plats, does not disqualify a property from special valuation so long as the property continues to be primarily used for agricultural purposes. Fountain II v. Douglas Cty. Bd. of Equal., 315 Neb. 633, 999 N.W.2d 135 (2024). The inclusion of the term "parcel" requires a county assessor to consider the use of an entire tract of land, including any homesite, to determine whether that property qualifies as agricultural. Agena v. Lancaster Cty. Bd. of Equal., 276 Neb. 851, 758 N.W.2d 363 (2008). This section does not violate Neb. Const. art. VIII, sec. 1. Agena v. Lancaster Cty. Bd. of Equal., 276 Neb. 851, 758 N.W.2d 363 (2008).

Nearby Sections

15
View on official source ↗

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Nebraska § 77-1359, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/ne/77-1359.