Nebraska Statutes
§ 74-308 — Real estate; acquisition; damages; procedure
Nebraska § 74-308
JurisdictionNebraska
Ch. 74Railroads
This text of Nebraska § 74-308 (Real estate; acquisition; damages; procedure) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nebraska primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Neb. Rev. Stat. § 74-308 (2026).
Text
Any railroad may purchase and use real estate for a price to be agreed upon with the owners thereof and may acquire the same through the exercise of the power of eminent domain. The procedure to condemn property shall be exercised in the manner set forth in sections 76-704 to 76-724 .
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Gustin v. Scheele
549 N.W.2d 135 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1996)
Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Chaulk
631 N.W.2d 131 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 2001)
BURLINGTON NORTHERN & SANTA FE v. Chaulk
631 N.W.2d 131 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 2001)
Legislative History
Source: R.S.1866, c. 25, § 95, p. 223; R.S.1913, § 5945; C.S.1922, § 5283; C.S.1929, § 74-306; R.S.1943, § 74-308; Laws 1951, c. 101, § 113, p. 501; Laws 1994, LB 414, § 3.
Annotations: Although railroads are private corporations, they have been given the statutory authority to acquire land through eminent domain. Railroads are required to exercise their eminent domain power in accordance with Nebraska's general eminent domain statutes, set forth at sections 76-701 to 76-726. Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Ry. Co. v. Chaulk, 262 Neb. 235, 631 N.W.2d 131 (2001). An attempt to agree with owner is condition precedent to condemnation. Higgins v. Loup River Public Power Dist., 157 Neb. 652, 61 N.W.2d 213 (1953). Taxation of costs in eminent domain proceedings by railroad company contrasted with procedure under other statutes. Kennedy v. Department of Roads & Irrigation, 150 Neb. 727, 35 N.W.2d 781 (1949). The fact that negotiations for purchase of a tract of land failed because of disagreement is sufficient to show that the parties were unable to agree and to authorize ascertainment of damages by condemnation. Rogers v. Cosgrave, 98 Neb. 608, 153 N.W. 569 (1915). The fact that by statute the railroad company may condemn land for a right-of-way if the parties are unable to agree will be considered with evidence tending to show that a contract for the purchase of such land is inequitable and not to be specifically enforced. Rice v. Lincoln & N. W. R. R. Co., 88 Neb. 307, 129 N.W. 425 (1911). Statutory provisions for the ascertainment of damages to a landowner whose property is taken by eminent domain apply only when real estate is taken or appropriated by the railroad company. Republican V. R. R. Co. v. Fellers, 16 Neb. 169, 20 N.W. 217 (1884). The mode provided for assessing damages for right-of-way does not apply where property is damaged but no portion thereof is taken. Burlington & M. R. R. Co. v. Reinhackle, 15 Neb. 279, 18 N.W. 69 (1883), 48 Am. R. 342 (1883). Provisions of this section for ascertaining damages apply only where property is taken. Where property is damaged, relief must be sought in an action for damages. Omaha Horse Ry. Co. v. Cable Tram-Way Co. of Omaha, 32 F. 727 (Cir. Ct., D. Neb. 1887).
Nearby Sections
15
§ 74-1001
Repealed. Laws 1994, LB 414, § 137§ 74-1002
Repealed. Laws 1957, c. 308, § 3§ 74-1003
Repealed. Laws 1957, c. 308, § 3§ 74-1004
Repealed. Laws 1994, LB 414, § 137§ 74-1005
Repealed. Laws 1994, LB 414, § 137§ 74-1006
Repealed. Laws 1994, LB 414, § 137§ 74-1007
Repealed. Laws 1957, c. 308, § 3§ 74-1008
Repealed. Laws 1994, LB 414, § 137§ 74-1009
Repealed. Laws 1957, c. 308, § 3§ 74-1010
Repealed. Laws 1994, LB 414, § 137§ 74-1011
Repealed. Laws 1994, LB 414, § 137§ 74-1012
Repealed. Laws 1994, LB 414, § 137Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
Nebraska § 74-308, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/ne/74-308.