Nebraska Statutes

§ 71-954 — Subject's rights; confront and cross-examine adverse witnesses and evidence

Nebraska § 71-954
JurisdictionNebraska
Ch. 71Public Health and Welfare

This text of Nebraska § 71-954 (Subject's rights; confront and cross-examine adverse witnesses and evidence) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nebraska primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Neb. Rev. Stat. § 71-954 (2026).

Text

(1)Except as provided in subsection (2) of this section, a subject shall have the right at a hearing held under the Nebraska Mental Health Commitment Act or the Sex Offender Commitment Act to confront and cross-examine adverse witnesses and evidence equivalent to the rights of confrontation granted by Amendments VI and XIV of the United States Constitution and Article I, section 11, of the Constitution of Nebraska.
(2)This section does not prohibit a mental health board from conducting a hearing using videoconferencing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Legislative History

Source: Laws 1976, LB 806, § 68; Laws 1981, LB 95, § 22; Laws 2000, LB 884, § 16; R.S.Supp.,2002, § 83-1058; Laws 2004, LB 1083, § 74; Laws 2006, LB 1199, § 46; Laws 2025, LB150, § 118. Operative Date: September 3, 2025 Cross References: Sex Offender Commitment Act, see section 71-1201. Annotations: Pursuant to this section, the subject of a petition under the Nebraska Mental Health Commitment Act has the right to confront and cross-examine adverse witnesses and evidence equivalent to the rights granted under the Confrontation Clauses of the U.S. and Nebraska Constitutions. In the absence of a waiver by the subject of a petition for commitment of his or her right to confrontation, in order to admit the telephonic testimony of a mental health professional during a civil commitment hearing, the State must demonstrate that (1) such testimony is necessary to further an important public policy and (2) the mental health professional is truly unavailable as a witness, thus necessitating telephonic testimony. The requirements of a demonstration of an important public policy and necessity are conjunctive, and the absence of a demonstration of either precludes the admission of the telephonic testimony. In re Interest of S.B., 263 Neb. 175, 639 N.W.2d 78 (2002).

Nearby Sections

15
View on official source ↗

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Nebraska § 71-954, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/ne/71-954.