Nebraska Statutes
§ 71-925 — Burden of proof; mental health board; hearing; orders authorized; conditions; rehearing
Nebraska § 71-925
JurisdictionNebraska
Ch. 71Public Health and Welfare
This text of Nebraska § 71-925 (Burden of proof; mental health board; hearing; orders authorized; conditions; rehearing) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nebraska primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Neb. Rev. Stat. § 71-925 (2026).
Text
(1)The state has the burden to prove by clear and convincing evidence that (a) the subject is mentally ill and dangerous and (b) neither voluntary hospitalization nor other treatment alternatives less restrictive of the subject's liberty than inpatient or outpatient treatment ordered by the mental health board are available or would suffice to prevent the harm described in section 71-908 .
(2)If the mental health board finds that the subject is not mentally ill and dangerous, the board shall dismiss the petition and order the unconditional discharge of the subject.
(3)If the mental health board finds that the subject is mentally ill and dangerous but that voluntary hospitalization or other treatment alternatives less restrictive of the subject's liberty than treatment ordered by the me
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Dennis W. v. Mental Health Board
717 N.W.2d 488 (Nebraska Court of Appeals, 2006)
In Re Interest of Michael U.
720 N.W.2d 403 (Nebraska Court of Appeals, 2006)
Kriz v. Roy
(D. Nebraska, 2020)
Legislative History
Source: Laws 1976, LB 806, § 47; Laws 1978, LB 501, § 7; Laws 1981, LB 95, § 16; Laws 1996, LB 1155, § 102; R.S.1943, (1999), § 83-1037; Laws 2004, LB 1083, § 45.
Annotations: The board of mental health's conclusion that a person before it is a mentally ill dangerous person and that a less restrictive alternative is not available or would not suffice to prevent the harm described in section 83-1009 must be supported by clear and convincing evidence. In re Interest of Vance, 242 Neb. 109, 493 N.W.2d 620 (1992). In determining whether a person is dangerous, the focus must be on the subject's condition at the time of the hearing, not the date the subject of the commitment hearing was initially taken into custody. In re Interest of Rasmussen, 236 Neb. 572, 462 N.W.2d 621 (1990). Statute requires proof that person is dangerous before he will be subject to involuntary confinement. Richards v. Douglas County, 213 Neb. 313, 328 N.W.2d 783 (1983). Pursuant to subsection (6) of this section, a mental health board, after considering all treatment alternatives including any treatment program or conditions suggested by the subject, the subject's counsel, or other interested person, can commit a person for inpatient treatment; such a treatment order shall represent the appropriate available treatment alternative that imposes the least possible restraint upon the liberty of the subject. Inpatient hospitalization or custody shall only be considered as a treatment alternative of last resort. In re Interest of Dennis W., 14 Neb. App. 827, 717 N.W.2d 488 (2006).
Nearby Sections
15
§ 71-1002
Repealed. Laws 2019, LB559, § 6§ 71-1005
Repealed. Laws 2019, LB559, § 6§ 71-1006
Repealed. Laws 2019, LB559, § 6§ 71-1007
Board; purpose§ 71-101
Transferred to section38-101§ 71-101.01
Repealed. Laws 2007, LB 463, § 1319§ 71-101.02
Repealed. Laws 1988, LB 1100, § 185§ 71-102
Transferred to section38-121§ 71-103
Transferred to section38-129§ 71-104.01
Transferred to section38-131§ 71-105
Transferred to section38-122Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
Nebraska § 71-925, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/ne/71-925.