Nebraska Statutes

§ 59-1602 — Unfair competition; practices; unlawful

Nebraska § 59-1602
JurisdictionNebraska
Ch. 59Monopolies and Unlawful Restraint of Trade

This text of Nebraska § 59-1602 (Unfair competition; practices; unlawful) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nebraska primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Neb. Rev. Stat. § 59-1602 (2026).

Text

Unfair methods of competition and unfair or deceptive acts or practices in the conduct of any trade or commerce shall be unlawful.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Nelson v. Lusterstone Surfacing Co.
605 N.W.2d 136 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 2000)
52 case citations
Laura Powers v. Credit Management Services, In
776 F.3d 567 (Eighth Circuit, 2015)
45 case citations
Jenkins v. General Collection Co.
538 F. Supp. 2d 1165 (D. Nebraska, 2008)
44 case citations
WWP, INC. v. Wounded Warriors Family Support, Inc.
628 F.3d 1032 (Eighth Circuit, 2011)
42 case citations
Salem Grain Co. v. Consolidated Grain & Barge Co.
297 Neb. 682 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 2017)
22 case citations
Raad v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
13 F. Supp. 2d 1003 (D. Nebraska, 1998)
11 case citations
Hage v. General Service Bureau
306 F. Supp. 2d 883 (D. Nebraska, 2003)
10 case citations
Clark v. BRUMBAUGH AND QUANDAHL, PC, LLO
731 F. Supp. 2d 915 (D. Nebraska, 2010)
6 case citations
Triple 7, Inc. v. Intervet, Inc.
338 F. Supp. 2d 1082 (D. Nebraska, 2004)
6 case citations
Jenkins v. Pech
301 F.R.D. 401 (D. Nebraska, 2014)
5 case citations
Ellison Educational Equipment, Inc. v. Accu-Cut System, Inc.
769 F. Supp. 1090 (D. Nebraska, 1991)
4 case citations
Harris v. D. Scott Carruthers & Assoc.
54 A.L.R. Fed. 2d 731 (D. Nebraska, 2010)
4 case citations
PW Eagle, Inc. v. Schnase
376 F. Supp. 2d 945 (D. Nebraska, 2005)
2 case citations
Opinion No. (1982)
(Nebraska Attorney General Reports, 1982)

Legislative History

Source: Laws 1974, LB 1028, § 9. Annotations: Immunity under the Noerr-Pennington doctrine may be raised as an affirmative defense against claims for violations of this section and section 59-1603 brought under section 59-1609. Salem Grain Co. v. Consolidated Grain & Barge Co., 297 Neb. 682, 900 N.W.2d 909 (2017). It was a violation of the Consumer Protection Act when consumers were led to believe they would receive a free freezer or another appliance by entering into a contract for food. State ex rel. Stenberg v. Consumer's Choice Foods, 276 Neb. 481, 755 N.W.2d 583 (2008). To be actionable under the Nebraska Consumer Protection Act, the unfair or deceptive act or practice must have an impact upon the public interest. Nelson v. Lusterstone Surfacing Co., 258 Neb. 678, 605 N.W.2d 136 (2000). Attorney General may bring an action to recover a civil penalty for a violation of this section. State ex rel. Stenberg v. American Midlands, 244 Neb. 887, 509 N.W.2d 633 (1994).

Nearby Sections

15
View on official source ↗

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Nebraska § 59-1602, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/ne/59-1602.