Nebraska Statutes
§ 57-228 — Mineral interest; severed; termination; suit in equity; defendants
Nebraska § 57-228
JurisdictionNebraska
Ch. 57Minerals, Oil, and Gas
This text of Nebraska § 57-228 (Mineral interest; severed; termination; suit in equity; defendants) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nebraska primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Neb. Rev. Stat. § 57-228 (2026).
Text
Any owner or owners of the surface of real estate from which a mineral interest has been severed, on behalf of himself and any other owners of such interest in the surface, may sue in equity in the county where such real estate, or some part thereof, is located, praying for the termination and extinguishment of such severed mineral interest and cancellation of the same of record, naming as parties defendant therein all persons having or appearing to have any interest in such severed mineral interest, and if such parties defendant are not known and cannot be ascertained, they may be proceeded against as unknown defendants under the provisions of Chapter 25, article 3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Gibbs Cattle Co. v. Bixler
831 N.W.2d 696 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 2013)
Fisher v. Heirs & Devisees of T.D. Lovercheck
291 Neb. 9 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 2015)
Ricks v. Vap
784 N.W.2d 432 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 2010)
WTJ Skavdahl Land v. Elliott
830 N.W.2d 488 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 2013)
Duerfeldt v. Ploeger
(Nebraska Court of Appeals, 2024)
Rice v. Bixler
(Nebraska Supreme Court, 2014)
Legislative History
Source: Laws 1967, c. 348, § 1, p. 925.
Annotations: Sections 57-228 to 57-231 which declared that mineral rights were abandoned unless the record owner had exercised ownership rights within twenty-three years immediately prior to the filing of an action to cancel the severed mineral interest, are unconstitutional insofar as the statutory provisions could be interpreted to be retroactive in their operation. Monahan Cattle Co. v. Goodwin, 201 Neb. 845, 272 N.W.2d 774 (1978); Wheelock & Manning 00 Ranches, Inc. v. Heath, 201 Neb. 835, 272 N.W.2d 768 (1978).
Nearby Sections
15
§ 57-1001
Service of process§ 57-1002
Repealed. Laws 1983, LB 447, § 104§ 57-102
Repealed. Laws 1949, c. 175, § 4§ 57-102.01
Repealed. Laws 1951, c. 190, § 1§ 57-102.02
Repealed. Laws 1951, c. 190, § 1§ 57-102.03
Repealed. Laws 1951, c. 190, § 1§ 57-103
Repealed. Laws 1951, c. 190, § 1§ 57-104
Prospectors; specimens preserved§ 57-105
Former discoveries; no aid givenCite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
Nebraska § 57-228, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/ne/57-228.