Nebraska Statutes
§ 29-4003 — Applicability of act
Nebraska § 29-4003
JurisdictionNebraska
Ch. 29Criminal Procedure
This text of Nebraska § 29-4003 (Applicability of act) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nebraska primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Neb. Rev. Stat. § 29-4003 (2026).
Text
(1)(a) The Sex Offender Registration Act applies to any person who on or after January 1, 1997:
(i)Has ever pled guilty to, pled nolo contendere to, or been found guilty of any of the following:
(A)Kidnapping of a minor pursuant to section 28-313 , except when the person is the parent of the minor and was not convicted of any other offense in this section;
(B)False imprisonment of a minor pursuant to section 28-314 or 28-315 ;
(C)Sexual assault pursuant to section 28-319 or 28-320 ;
(D)Sexual abuse by a school worker pursuant to section 28-316.01 ;
(E)Sexual assault of a child in the second or third degree pursuant to section 28-320.01 ;
(F)Sexual assault of a child in the first degree pursuant to section 28-319.01 ;
(G)Sexual abuse of a vulnerable adult or senior adult p
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Doe v. Nebraska
734 F. Supp. 2d 882 (D. Nebraska, 2010)
A.W. Ex Rel. Doe v. Nebraska
865 F.3d 1014 (Eighth Circuit, 2017)
State v. Pauly
972 N.W.2d 907 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 2022)
State v. Simnick
771 N.W.2d 196 (Nebraska Court of Appeals, 2009)
State v. Wilson
306 Neb. 875 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 2020)
John Doe, I v. Doug Peterson
43 F.4th 838 (Eighth Circuit, 2022)
State v. Strawn
318 Neb. 859 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 2025)
Doe I v. Peterson
(D. Nebraska, 2021)
In re Interest of K.D.
(Nebraska Court of Appeals, 2020)
In re Interest of K.W.
(Nebraska Court of Appeals, 2017)
Lammers v. Ag Valley Cooperative Non-Stock
(D. Nebraska, 2023)
Martinez v. Dawson
(Nebraska Court of Appeals, 2020)
Martinez v. Whitmire
(D. Nebraska, 2021)
State v. Alston
(Nebraska Court of Appeals, 2020)
State v. Clark
(Nebraska Court of Appeals, 2014)
State v. Clemens
300 Neb. 601 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 2018)
State v. Gentry
(Nebraska Court of Appeals, 2013)
State v. Harder
(Nebraska Court of Appeals, 2018)
State v. Kresha
25 Neb. Ct. App. 543 (Nebraska Court of Appeals, 2018)
State v. Lopez
(Nebraska Court of Appeals, 2023)
Legislative History
Source: Laws 1996, LB 645, § 3; Laws 2002, LB 564, § 3; Laws 2004, LB 943, § 9; Laws 2005, LB 713, § 4; Laws 2006, LB 1199, § 18; Laws 2009, LB97, § 25; Laws 2009, LB285, § 4; Laws 2011, LB61, § 2; Laws 2014, LB998, § 6; Laws 2016, LB934, § 11; Laws 2019, LB519, § 14; Laws 2019, LB630, § 7; Laws 2020, LB881, § 26; Laws 2022, LB1246, § 2; Laws 2025, LB150, § 38; Laws 2025, LB383, § 20. Operative Date: September 3, 2025 Note: The Revisor of Statutes has pursuant to section 49-769 correlated LB150, section 38, with LB383, section 20, to reflect all amendments.
Annotations: 1. Applicability 2. Standard of review 3. Nonsexual offenses 4. Other jurisdictions 1. Applicability The Sex Offender Registration Act applies to an individual whose crime occurred prior to January 1, 1997, if the individual was incarcerated or on probation or parole for that crime on and after January 1, 1997. In re Interest of D.H., 281 Neb. 554, 797 N.W.2d 263 (2011). A crime that is generally not a typical sex crime may still require registration under the Sex Offender Registration Act if the court finds that evidence of sexual penetration or sexual contact was present in the record. The State must establish the fact of sexual penetration or sexual contact by clear and convincing evidence. State v. Sindt, 32 Neb. App. 610, 3 N.W.3d 100 (2024). The defendant's convictions for third degree assault and false imprisonment required registration under the Sex Offender Registration Act when circumstantial evidence satisfied the requirements of this section, even though DNA reports excluded the defendant as a contributor to the DNA from the victim's external genital swabs. State v. Sindt, 32 Neb. App. 610, 3 N.W.3d 100 (2024). Incest of an adult is not a registrable offense under the Sex Offender Registration Act. State v. Aguilar-Moreno, 17 Neb. App. 623, 769 N.W.2d 784 (2009). 2. Standard of review The finding required under subsection (1)(b)(i)(B) of this section should be established by clear and convincing evidence. State v. Norman, 282 Neb. 990, 808 N.W.2d 48 (2012). 3. Nonsexual offenses A finding under subdivision (1)(b)(i)(B) of this section must be made during the proceedings on the underlying conviction or plea and is a judgment on the issue of the Sex Offender Registration Act's application to the defendant, which must be appealed at the end of the proceeding. State v. Ratumaimuri, 299 Neb. 887, 911 N.W.2d 270 (2018). Before determining that a defendant convicted of a crime not sexual in nature is subject to sex offender registration pursuant to subsection (1)(b)(i)(B) of this section, the court must provide notice and a hearing and must make the finding whether sexual penetration or sexual contact occurred in connection with the incident that gave rise to the conviction based on the record and the hearing. State v. Norman, 282 Neb. 990, 808 N.W.2d 48 (2012). Subsection (1)(b)(i)(B) of this section provides that the court's finding shall include consideration of the factual basis for a plea-based conviction and information contained in the presentence report. However, the statute does not limit the court's consideration to such sources and, because a liberty interest is at stake, a meaningful hearing requires consideration of evidence at the hearing as well as the factual basis and the presentence report. State v. Norman, 282 Neb. 990, 808 N.W.2d 48 (2012). 4. Other jurisdictions A sex offender registrant's actual registration under another jurisdiction's law is conclusive evidence that the registrant was required to register within the meaning of subdivision (1)(a)(iv) of this section. State v. Clemens, 300 Neb. 601, 915 N.W.2d 550 (2018). Under subdivision (1)(a)(iv) of this section, whether one is "required to register as a sex offender" in another jurisdiction is determined under the laws of the other jurisdiction rather than under Nebraska law. Subdivision (1)(a)(iv) of this section adds no additional requirement that registration in the other jurisdiction must be based on a "conviction" or an offense that would have required the person to register in Nebraska if the offense had been committed in Nebraska. State v. Clemens, 300 Neb. 601, 915 N.W.2d 550 (2018). A sex offender registrant's actual registration under another jurisdiction's law is conclusive evidence that the registrant was "required" to register within the meaning of subsection (1)(a)(iv) of this section. Skaggs v. Nebraska State Patrol, 282 Neb. 154, 804 N.W.2d 611 (2011). Subsection (1)(a)(iv) of this section has no residency requirement. Skaggs v. Nebraska State Patrol, 282 Neb. 154, 804 N.W.2d 611 (2011).
Nearby Sections
15
§ 29-1001
Prisoner; where confined§ 29-1002
Repealed. Laws 1998, LB 695, § 10§ 29-1003
Repealed. Laws 1998, LB 695, § 10§ 29-1004
Repealed. Laws 1998, LB 695, § 10§ 29-1005
Repealed. Laws 1998, LB 695, § 10§ 29-1006
Repealed. Laws 1990, LB 829, § 3§ 29-101
Terms, usage§ 29-103
Magistrate, defined§ 29-104
Prosecuting attorney, defined§ 29-108
Signature, how construedCite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
Nebraska § 29-4003, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/ne/29-4003.