Nebraska Statutes

§ 29-1919 — Discovery; failure to comply; effect

Nebraska § 29-1919
JurisdictionNebraska
Ch. 29Criminal Procedure

This text of Nebraska § 29-1919 (Discovery; failure to comply; effect) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nebraska primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Neb. Rev. Stat. § 29-1919 (2026).

Text

If, at any time during the course of the proceedings it is brought to the attention of the court that a party has failed to comply with sections 29-1912 to 29-1921 or an order issued pursuant to sections 29-1912 to 29-1921 , the court may:

(1)Order such party to permit the discovery or inspection of materials not previously disclosed;
(2)Grant a continuance;
(3)Prohibit the party from calling a witness not disclosed or introducing in evidence the material not disclosed; or
(4)Enter such other order as it deems just under the circumstances.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Henry
875 N.W.2d 374 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 2016)
330 case citations
State v. Robinson
715 N.W.2d 531 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 2006)
177 case citations
State v. Huffman
385 N.W.2d 85 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1986)
72 case citations
State v. Vicars
299 N.W.2d 421 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1980)
48 case citations
State v. Schmidt
562 N.W.2d 859 (Nebraska Court of Appeals, 1997)
39 case citations
State v. Devers
306 Neb. 429 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 2020)
31 case citations
State v. Sierra
305 Neb. 249 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 2020)
30 case citations
State v. Turner
998 N.W.2d 783 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 2024)
23 case citations
State v. Russell
292 Neb. 501 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 2016)
20 case citations
State v. Short
310 Neb. 81 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 2021)
18 case citations
State v. Boyer
318 N.W.2d 60 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1982)
9 case citations
State v. Hinn
427 N.W.2d 791 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1988)
8 case citations
State v. Surber
380 N.W.2d 293 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1986)
7 case citations
State v. Torres Aquino
318 Neb. 771 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 2025)
4 case citations
State v. Hatfield
304 Neb. 66 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 2019)
3 case citations
State v. Johnson
979 N.W.2d 123 (Nebraska Court of Appeals, 2022)
2 case citations
In re Interest of Austin R.
(Nebraska Court of Appeals, 2025)
State v. Case
304 Neb. 829 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 2020)
State v. McKean
(Nebraska Court of Appeals, 2016)
State v. Pochop
(Nebraska Court of Appeals, 2019)

Legislative History

Source: Laws 1969, c. 235, § 8, p. 870; Laws 2019, LB496, § 9. Annotations: Under the plain meaning of this section, if a party fails to comply with discovery and give notice of an intent to call a witness, the court may prohibit that witness from being called. State v. Sierra, 305 Neb. 249, 939 N.W.2d 808 (2020). Under this section, on determination that a discovery order has not been complied with, the trial court has broad discretion to enter such other order as it deems just under the circumstances. State v. Surber, 221 Neb. 714, 380 N.W.2d 293 (1986). Subsection (4) of section 29-1919, R.R.S.1943, allows a court to enter no order at all. State v. Vicars, 207 Neb. 325, 299 N.W.2d 421 (1980).

Nearby Sections

15
View on official source ↗

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Nebraska § 29-1919, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/ne/29-1919.