Nebraska Statutes
§ 29-1919 — Discovery; failure to comply; effect
Nebraska § 29-1919
JurisdictionNebraska
Ch. 29Criminal Procedure
This text of Nebraska § 29-1919 (Discovery; failure to comply; effect) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nebraska primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Neb. Rev. Stat. § 29-1919 (2026).
Text
If, at any time during the course of the proceedings it is brought to the attention of the court that a party has failed to comply with sections 29-1912 to 29-1921 or an order issued pursuant to sections 29-1912 to 29-1921 , the court may:
(1)Order such party to permit the discovery or inspection of materials not previously disclosed;
(2)Grant a continuance;
(3)Prohibit the party from calling a witness not disclosed or introducing in evidence the material not disclosed; or
(4)Enter such other order as it deems just under the circumstances.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
State v. Henry
875 N.W.2d 374 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 2016)
State v. Robinson
715 N.W.2d 531 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 2006)
State v. Huffman
385 N.W.2d 85 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1986)
State v. Vicars
299 N.W.2d 421 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1980)
State v. Schmidt
562 N.W.2d 859 (Nebraska Court of Appeals, 1997)
State v. Devers
306 Neb. 429 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 2020)
State v. Sierra
305 Neb. 249 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 2020)
State v. Turner
998 N.W.2d 783 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 2024)
State v. Russell
292 Neb. 501 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 2016)
State v. Short
310 Neb. 81 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 2021)
State v. Boyer
318 N.W.2d 60 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1982)
State v. Hinn
427 N.W.2d 791 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1988)
State v. Surber
380 N.W.2d 293 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1986)
State v. Torres Aquino
318 Neb. 771 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 2025)
State v. Hatfield
304 Neb. 66 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 2019)
State v. Johnson
979 N.W.2d 123 (Nebraska Court of Appeals, 2022)
In re Interest of Austin R.
(Nebraska Court of Appeals, 2025)
State v. Case
304 Neb. 829 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 2020)
State v. McKean
(Nebraska Court of Appeals, 2016)
State v. Pochop
(Nebraska Court of Appeals, 2019)
Legislative History
Source: Laws 1969, c. 235, § 8, p. 870; Laws 2019, LB496, § 9.
Annotations: Under the plain meaning of this section, if a party fails to comply with discovery and give notice of an intent to call a witness, the court may prohibit that witness from being called. State v. Sierra, 305 Neb. 249, 939 N.W.2d 808 (2020). Under this section, on determination that a discovery order has not been complied with, the trial court has broad discretion to enter such other order as it deems just under the circumstances. State v. Surber, 221 Neb. 714, 380 N.W.2d 293 (1986). Subsection (4) of section 29-1919, R.R.S.1943, allows a court to enter no order at all. State v. Vicars, 207 Neb. 325, 299 N.W.2d 421 (1980).
Nearby Sections
15
§ 29-1001
Prisoner; where confined§ 29-1002
Repealed. Laws 1998, LB 695, § 10§ 29-1003
Repealed. Laws 1998, LB 695, § 10§ 29-1004
Repealed. Laws 1998, LB 695, § 10§ 29-1005
Repealed. Laws 1998, LB 695, § 10§ 29-1006
Repealed. Laws 1990, LB 829, § 3§ 29-101
Terms, usage§ 29-103
Magistrate, defined§ 29-104
Prosecuting attorney, defined§ 29-108
Signature, how construedCite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
Nebraska § 29-1919, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/ne/29-1919.