Nebraska Statutes

§ 29-122 — Criminal responsibility; intoxication; not a defense; exceptions

Nebraska § 29-122
JurisdictionNebraska
Ch. 29Criminal Procedure

This text of Nebraska § 29-122 (Criminal responsibility; intoxication; not a defense; exceptions) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nebraska primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Neb. Rev. Stat. § 29-122 (2026).

Text

A person who is intoxicated is criminally responsible for his or her conduct. Intoxication is not a defense to any criminal offense and shall not be taken into consideration in determining the existence of a mental state that is an element of the criminal offense unless the defendant proves, by clear and convincing evidence, that he or she did not (1) know that it was an intoxicating substance when he or she ingested, inhaled, injected, or absorbed the substance causing the intoxication or (2) ingest, inhale, inject, or absorb the intoxicating substance voluntarily.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Braesch
874 N.W.2d 874 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 2016)
162 case citations
State v. Hinrichsen
877 N.W.2d 211 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 2016)
131 case citations
State v. Clark
315 Neb. 736 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 2024)
50 case citations
State v. Abejide
879 N.W.2d 684 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 2016)
26 case citations
State v. Barnes
317 Neb. 517 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 2024)
26 case citations
State v. Esch
315 Neb. 482 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 2023)
17 case citations
State v. Cheloha
25 Neb. Ct. App. 403 (Nebraska Court of Appeals, 2018)
6 case citations
State v. Brennauer
314 Neb. 782 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 2023)
1 case citations
State v. Bigelow
303 Neb. 729 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 2019)
State v. Bigelow
(Nebraska Court of Appeals, 2019)
State v. Diego-Antonio
(Nebraska Court of Appeals, 2018)
State v. Dubray
(Nebraska Supreme Court, 2014)
State v. Hood
301 Neb. 207 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 2018)
State v. Mueller
301 Neb. 778 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 2018)
State v. Niewohner
(Nebraska Court of Appeals, 2020)

Legislative History

Source: Laws 2011, LB100, § 1. Annotations: The defendant's being "heavily intoxicated" did not preclude her from having the requisite intent to terrorize the victim where the defendant pointed to no evidence that, on the night in question, she did not know she was ingesting alcohol or that she did not voluntarily ingest alcohol. State v. Clark, 315 Neb. 736, 1 N.W.3d 487 (2024). In enacting this section, the Legislature redefined the mental state elements of all subjective criminal offenses in Nebraska to provide for an objective inquiry: whether the State proved circumstances surrounding the offense that would otherwise establish the requisite mental state "but for" the defendant's voluntary intoxication. State v. Esch, 315 Neb. 482, 997 N.W.2d 569 (2023). Voluntary intoxication is not a defense to any criminal offense and shall not be taken into consideration in determining the existence of a mental state that is an element of the criminal offense. State v. Cheloha, 25 Neb. App. 403, 907 N.W.2d 317 (2018).

Nearby Sections

15
View on official source ↗

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Nebraska § 29-122, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/ne/29-122.