Nebraska Statutes
§ 29-122 — Criminal responsibility; intoxication; not a defense; exceptions
Nebraska § 29-122
JurisdictionNebraska
Ch. 29Criminal Procedure
This text of Nebraska § 29-122 (Criminal responsibility; intoxication; not a defense; exceptions) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nebraska primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Neb. Rev. Stat. § 29-122 (2026).
Text
A
person who is intoxicated is criminally responsible for his or her conduct.
Intoxication is not a defense to any criminal offense and shall not be taken
into consideration in determining the existence of a mental state that is
an element of the criminal offense unless the defendant proves, by clear and
convincing evidence, that he or she did not (1) know that it was an intoxicating
substance when he or she ingested, inhaled, injected, or absorbed the substance
causing the intoxication or (2) ingest, inhale, inject, or absorb the intoxicating
substance voluntarily.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
State v. Braesch
874 N.W.2d 874 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 2016)
State v. Hinrichsen
877 N.W.2d 211 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 2016)
State v. Clark
315 Neb. 736 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 2024)
State v. Abejide
879 N.W.2d 684 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 2016)
State v. Barnes
317 Neb. 517 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 2024)
State v. Esch
315 Neb. 482 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 2023)
State v. Cheloha
25 Neb. Ct. App. 403 (Nebraska Court of Appeals, 2018)
State v. Brennauer
314 Neb. 782 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 2023)
State v. Bigelow
303 Neb. 729 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 2019)
State v. Bigelow
(Nebraska Court of Appeals, 2019)
State v. Diego-Antonio
(Nebraska Court of Appeals, 2018)
State v. Dubray
(Nebraska Supreme Court, 2014)
State v. Hood
301 Neb. 207 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 2018)
State v. Mueller
301 Neb. 778 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 2018)
State v. Niewohner
(Nebraska Court of Appeals, 2020)
Legislative History
Source: Laws 2011, LB100, § 1.
Annotations: The defendant's being "heavily intoxicated" did not preclude her from having the requisite intent to terrorize the victim where the defendant pointed to no evidence that, on the night in question, she did not know she was ingesting alcohol or that she did not voluntarily ingest alcohol. State v. Clark, 315 Neb. 736, 1 N.W.3d 487 (2024). In enacting this section, the Legislature redefined the mental state elements of all subjective criminal offenses in Nebraska to provide for an objective inquiry: whether the State proved circumstances surrounding the offense that would otherwise establish the requisite mental state "but for" the defendant's voluntary intoxication. State v. Esch, 315 Neb. 482, 997 N.W.2d 569 (2023). Voluntary intoxication is not a defense to any criminal offense and shall not be taken into consideration in determining the existence of a mental state that is an element of the criminal offense. State v. Cheloha, 25 Neb. App. 403, 907 N.W.2d 317 (2018).
Nearby Sections
15
§ 29-1001
Prisoner; where confined§ 29-1002
Repealed. Laws 1998, LB 695, § 10§ 29-1003
Repealed. Laws 1998, LB 695, § 10§ 29-1004
Repealed. Laws 1998, LB 695, § 10§ 29-1005
Repealed. Laws 1998, LB 695, § 10§ 29-1006
Repealed. Laws 1990, LB 829, § 3§ 29-101
Terms, usage§ 29-103
Magistrate, defined§ 29-104
Prosecuting attorney, defined§ 29-108
Signature, how construedCite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
Nebraska § 29-122, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/ne/29-122.