Nebraska Statutes

§ 29-116 — Suppression of statement by defendant; order granting suppression; review; procedure; appeal

Nebraska § 29-116
JurisdictionNebraska
Ch. 29Criminal Procedure

This text of Nebraska § 29-116 (Suppression of statement by defendant; order granting suppression; review; procedure; appeal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nebraska primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Neb. Rev. Stat. § 29-116 (2026).

Text

(1)In addition to any other rights of appeal, the state shall have the right to appeal from an order granting a motion for the suppression of statements alleged to be involuntary or in violation of the fifth or sixth amendments of the Constitution of the United States in the manner provided in this section.
(2)If such motion has been granted in the district court, the Attorney General or the county attorney or prosecuting attorney with the consent of the Attorney General may file his or her application with the Clerk of the Supreme Court asking for a summary review of the order granting the motion. The review shall be made by a judge of the Court of Appeals at chambers upon such notice, briefs, and argument as the judge directs, after which such judge shall enter his or her order affirmi

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Interest of Tyrone K.
887 N.W.2d 489 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 2016)
131 case citations
State v. Hayes
639 N.W.2d 418 (Nebraska Court of Appeals, 2002)
56 case citations
State v. Staten
469 N.W.2d 112 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1991)
46 case citations
State v. Dickson
389 N.W.2d 785 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1986)
34 case citations
State v. Relford
623 N.W.2d 343 (Nebraska Court of Appeals, 2001)
9 case citations
State v. Haywood
439 N.W.2d 511 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1989)
8 case citations
State v. Recek
641 N.W.2d 391 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 2002)
8 case citations
State v. Nash
421 N.W.2d 41 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1988)
7 case citations
State v. Houser
450 N.W.2d 697 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1990)
4 case citations
State v. Tamerius
449 N.W.2d 535 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1989)
4 case citations
State v. Vaida
510 N.W.2d 389 (Nebraska Court of Appeals, 1993)
4 case citations
State v. Weikle
474 N.W.2d 486 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1991)
4 case citations
State v. McDowell
488 N.W.2d 593 (Nebraska Court of Appeals, 1992)
3 case citations
State v. Favero
331 N.W.2d 259 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1983)
1 case citations
State v. Meyers
393 N.W.2d 533 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1986)
1 case citations
State v. Pawling
621 N.W.2d 821 (Nebraska Court of Appeals, 2000)
1 case citations
State v. Coleman
419 N.W.2d 878 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1988)
State v. Peterson
366 N.W.2d 780 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1985)
State v. Phelps
456 N.W.2d 290 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1990)

Legislative History

Source: Laws 1981, LB 411, § 2; Laws 1991, LB 732, § 71; Laws 1992, LB 360, § 7; Laws 1998, LB 218, § 10. Annotations: A defendant's successful motion in the district court to suppress evidence is not finally granted or determined, unless there is no appeal, until a judge of the Court of Appeals has decided the matter under this section. The time from the defendant's filing of such motion until final determination is excluded in the speedy trial calculation. State v. Hayes, 10 Neb. App. 833, 639 N.W.2d 418 (2002). A trial court may, in its good judgment, correct its pretrial ruling on a motion to suppress statements, even though such a correction results in denial of the State's opportunity to appeal the decision to suppress the evidence. State v. Vaida, 1 Neb. App. 768, 510 N.W.2d 389 (1993).

Nearby Sections

15
View on official source ↗

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Nebraska § 29-116, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/ne/29-116.