Nebraska Statutes

§ 29-1106 — Recognizance forfeited; when

Nebraska § 29-1106
JurisdictionNebraska
Ch. 29Criminal Procedure

This text of Nebraska § 29-1106 (Recognizance forfeited; when) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nebraska primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Neb. Rev. Stat. § 29-1106 (2026).

Text

When there is a breach of condition of a recognizance, the court shall declare a forfeiture of the bail.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Hernandez
511 N.W.2d 535 (Nebraska Court of Appeals, 1993)
15 case citations
Sate v. Oxarart
(Nebraska Court of Appeals, 2021)

Legislative History

Source: Laws 1953, c. 88, § 1, p. 259. Annotations: When the defendant failed to appear in court as his bond required, the liability on the bond became absolute and forfeiture was proper. State v. Hart, 198 Neb. 164, 252 N.W.2d 139 (1977). Bail bond was properly forfeited where defendant absconded during trial of case. State v. Reed, 178 Neb. 370, 133 N.W.2d 591 (1965). Action of district court in entering judgment in excess of penalty on bond did not deprive court of jurisdiction. State v. Morse, 171 Neb. 87, 105 N.W.2d 572 (1960). On breach of condition of recognizance, court should declare forfeiture. State v. Konvalin, 165 Neb. 499, 86 N.W.2d 361 (1957); State v. Honey, 165 Neb. 494, 86 N.W.2d 187 (1957). Appeal bond properly forfeited where defendant breached condition that he not violate the law. Trial court did not abuse its discretion by prescribing that the defendant not violate the law as a condition of the appeal bond. State v. Hernandez, 1 Neb. App. 830, 511 N.W.2d 535 (1993).

Nearby Sections

15
View on official source ↗

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Nebraska § 29-1106, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/ne/29-1106.