Nebraska Statutes
§ 28-912 — Escape; official detention, defined; knowingly permitting an escape; penalty; defense to prosecution
Nebraska § 28-912
JurisdictionNebraska
Ch. 28Crimes and Punishments
This text of Nebraska § 28-912 (Escape; official detention, defined; knowingly permitting an escape; penalty; defense to prosecution) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nebraska primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Neb. Rev. Stat. § 28-912 (2026).
Text
(1)A person commits escape if he or she unlawfully removes himself or herself from official detention or fails to return to official detention following temporary leave granted for a specific purpose or limited period. Official detention means arrest, detention in or transportation to any facility for custody of persons under charge or conviction of crime or contempt or for persons alleged or found to be delinquent, detention for extradition or deportation, or any other detention for law enforcement purposes. Official detention does not include supervision of probation or parole or constraint incidental to release on bail.
(2)A public servant concerned in detention commits an offense if he or she knowingly permits an escape. Any person who knowingly causes or facilitates an escape commit
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
United States v. Marlon Dale Sun Bear, A/K/A Dale Sun Bear, A/K/A Ben James
307 F.3d 747 (Eighth Circuit, 2002)
State v. Steven S. (In Re Steven S.)
299 Neb. 447 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 2018)
United States v. Lucas
499 F.3d 769 (Eighth Circuit, 2007)
State v. Parks
573 N.W.2d 453 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1998)
State v. Olsan
436 N.W.2d 128 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1989)
State v. Cousins
302 N.W.2d 731 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1981)
State v. Coffman
330 N.W.2d 727 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1983)
United States v. Williams
627 F.3d 324 (Eighth Circuit, 2010)
State v. Gibbs
470 N.W.2d 558 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1991)
State v. Isikoff
392 N.W.2d 783 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1986)
State v. Moss
480 N.W.2d 198 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1992)
State v. White
306 N.W.2d 906 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1981)
United States v. Alfred Tucker
740 F.3d 1177 (Eighth Circuit, 2014)
State v. Johnson
290 Neb. 369 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 2015)
State v. Heathman
395 N.W.2d 538 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1986)
State v. Schlothauer
294 N.W.2d 382 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1980)
In re Interest of Joezia P.
30 Neb. Ct. App. 281 (Nebraska Court of Appeals, 2021)
In re Interest of Steven S.
299 Neb. 447 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 2018)
State v. Farr
306 N.W.2d 854 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1981)
State v. Erb
576 N.W.2d 839 (Nebraska Court of Appeals, 1998)
Legislative History
Source: Laws 1977, LB 38, § 197; Laws 2015, LB605, § 46.
Annotations: A juvenile is being held in detention pursuant to official proceedings when he flees from a transportation employee that is escorting him to a medical appointment. In re Interest of Matthew P., 275 Neb. 189, 745 N.W.2d 574 (2008). When an incarcerated criminal defendant is charged with escape under subsection (1) of this section, no prejudice results from trying the defendant while he or she is wearing jail clothing. State v. Sorich, 226 Neb. 547, 412 N.W.2d 484 (1987). Some degree of custody is essential before one can be considered to be in official detention. Constructive, as distinguished from physical, restraint sufficient to constitute a constructive seizure or detention of an arrestee exists where an officer has the intention to effect an arrest, that intention has in some way been communicated to the arrestee, the arrestee understands that he is under legal restraint, and the officer has apparent present power to control the person even though he has not yet asserted physical control. State v. Hicks, 225 Neb. 322, 404 N.W.2d 923 (1987). Nebraska's escape statute defines one offense and sets out factors which, if present, change the range of the penalty. State v. Heathman, 224 Neb. 19, 395 N.W.2d 538 (1986). A person on work release is within the custody and control of the Nebraska Penal and Correctional Complex. Walking away from work release is an "escape" within the meaning of this statute. State v. Stafford, 213 Neb. 595, 330 N.W.2d 739 (1983); State v. Ford, 213 Neb. 594, 330 N.W.2d 497 (1983); State v. Coffman, 213 Neb. 560, 330 N.W.2d 727 (1983). For purposes of this section, constructive restraint takes place when an officer has the intention to effect an arrest and that intention has been communicated to the arrestee who understands that he is under legal restraint and the officer has the apparent present power to control the arrestee even though he has not asserted physical control. State v. White, 209 Neb. 218, 306 N.W.2d 906 (1981). A person who is serving a jail sentence pursuant to official proceedings commits the crime of escape when that person flees while in the custody of a police detective who has removed the person from the jail facility in furtherance of law enforcement purposes. State v. Farr, 209 Neb. 163, 306 N.W.2d 854 (1981). If a prisoner escapes from jail while he is being held on a charge of violation of probation, the fact that the charge may be unfounded does not prevent him from being guilty of escape. State v. Greaser, 207 Neb. 668, 300 N.W.2d 197 (1981). Legal custody is an essential element of the crime of escape. State v. Schlothauer, 206 Neb. 670, 294 N.W.2d 382 (1980).
Nearby Sections
15
§ 28-1001
Repealed. Laws 1990, LB 50, § 13§ 28-1002
Repealed. Laws 1990, LB 50, § 13§ 28-1003
Transferred to section28-1010§ 28-1004
Terms, defined§ 28-1007
Sections, how
construed§ 28-1008
Terms, defined§ 28-1009.02
Repealed. Laws 2010, LB 865, § 17§ 28-1009.03
Repealed. Laws 2010, LB 865, § 17§ 28-101
Code, how cited§ 28-1010
Indecency with
an animal; penaltyCite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
Nebraska § 28-912, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/ne/28-912.