Nebraska Statutes

§ 28-603 — Forgery, second degree; penalty; aggregation allowed; when

Nebraska § 28-603
JurisdictionNebraska
Ch. 28Crimes and Punishments

This text of Nebraska § 28-603 (Forgery, second degree; penalty; aggregation allowed; when) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nebraska primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Neb. Rev. Stat. § 28-603 (2026).

Text

(1)Whoever, with intent to deceive or harm, falsely makes, completes, endorses, alters, or utters any written instrument which is or purports to be, or which is calculated to become or to represent if completed, a written instrument which does or may evidence, create, transfer, terminate, or otherwise affect a legal right, interest, obligation, or status, commits forgery in the second degree.
(2)Forgery in the second degree is a Class IIA felony when the face value, or purported face value, or the amount of any proceeds wrongfully procured or intended to be procured by the use of such instrument, is five thousand dollars or more.
(3)Forgery in the second degree is a Class IV felony when the face value, or purported face value, or the amount of any proceeds wrongfully procured or intende

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Irish
394 N.W.2d 879 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1986)
198 case citations
State v. Bostwick
385 N.W.2d 906 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1986)
93 case citations
State v. Castor
632 N.W.2d 298 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 2001)
39 case citations
State v. Ward
510 N.W.2d 320 (Nebraska Court of Appeals, 1993)
29 case citations
State v. Davis
398 N.W.2d 729 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1987)
16 case citations
County of Lancaster v. Office of Juvenile Services
621 N.W.2d 65 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 2000)
6 case citations
State v. Stastny
419 N.W.2d 873 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1988)
6 case citations
State v. Sack
477 N.W.2d 921 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1991)
5 case citations
State v. Ebert
324 N.W.2d 812 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1982)
4 case citations
State v. Tate
385 N.W.2d 456 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1986)
4 case citations
State v. Turner
375 N.W.2d 154 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1985)
4 case citations
State v. Cotton
519 N.W.2d 1 (Nebraska Court of Appeals, 1994)
2 case citations
State v. Ummel
500 N.W.2d 191 (Nebraska Court of Appeals, 1993)
2 case citations
State v. Kowalski
332 N.W.2d 678 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1983)
1 case citations
State v. Miller
562 N.W.2d 851 (Nebraska Court of Appeals, 1997)
1 case citations
Hill v. AMMC, Inc.
300 Neb. 412 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 2018)
State v. Lange
426 N.W.2d 897 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1988)
State v. Martinez-Fernandez
(Nebraska Court of Appeals, 2017)
State v. McClain
(Nebraska Court of Appeals, 2018)

Legislative History

Source: Laws 1977, LB 38, § 125; Laws 2003, LB 17, § 7; Laws 2009, LB155, § 13; Laws 2015, LB605, § 32. Annotations: To sustain a conviction for forgery, it is not sufficient for the State to show that a signature is not that of the party whose name is used, but it must also affirmatively be shown that the signing was made without his or her authority. State v. Castor, 262 Neb. 423, 632 N.W.2d 298 (2001). The elements of the crime of uttering a forged instrument are (1) the offering of a forged instrument with the representation by words or acts that it is true or genuine, (2) the knowledge that same is false, forged, or counterfeited, and (3) the intent to defraud. State v. Tate, 222 Neb. 586, 385 N.W.2d 456 (1986).

Nearby Sections

15
View on official source ↗

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Nebraska § 28-603, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/ne/28-603.