Nebraska Statutes
§ 25-1803 — Award of fees and expenses against state; when authorized
Nebraska § 25-1803
JurisdictionNebraska
Ch. 25Courts; Civil Procedure
This text of Nebraska § 25-1803 (Award of fees and expenses against state; when authorized) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nebraska primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-1803 (2026).
Text
(1)Unless otherwise provided by law, the court having jurisdiction over a civil action brought by the state or an action for judicial review brought against the state pursuant to the Administrative Procedure Act shall award fees and other expenses to the prevailing party unless the prevailing party is the state, except that the court shall not award fees and expenses if it finds that the position of the state was substantially justified.
(2)The court, in its discretion, may reduce the amount to be awarded pursuant to this section, or deny an award, to the extent that the prevailing party, during the course of the proceedings engaged in conduct which unduly and unreasonably protracted the final resolution of the matter in controversy or when an overriding public interest exists which woul
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Prokop v. Lower Loup Natural Res. Dist.
302 Neb. 10 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 2019)
State v. Schanaman
835 N.W.2d 66 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 2013)
Meier v. STATE, DEPT. OF SOCIAL SERVICES
417 N.W.2d 771 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1988)
Interest of Krystal P.
557 N.W.2d 26 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1996)
State v. One Thousand Nine Hundred Forty-Seven Dollars in U.S. Currency
583 N.W.2d 611 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1998)
Prokop v. Lower Loup NRD
302 Neb. 10 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 2019)
Jakoubek v. Fortis Benefits Insurance
301 F. Supp. 2d 1045 (D. Nebraska, 2003)
McHenry v. Nebraska Liquor Control Commission
555 N.W.2d 350 (Nebraska Court of Appeals, 1996)
Hauxwell v. Middle Republican NRD
319 Neb. 28 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 2025)
In re Interest of A.A.
308 Neb. 749 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 2021)
Drinkwine v. Flebbe
363 N.W.2d 152 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1985)
First Data Resources, Inc. v. Sorensen
371 N.W.2d 306 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1985)
Webb v. Nebraska Dept. of Health & Human Servs.
301 Neb. 810 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 2018)
Legislative History
Source: Laws 1982, LB 192, § 2.
Cross References: Administrative Procedure Act, see section 84-920.
Annotations: The mere fact that the State has not been successful in an appellate court does not mean its position was not substantially justified. In re Interest of A.A. et al., 308 Neb. 749, 957 N.W.2d 138 (2021). This section does not waive sovereign immunity regarding attorney fees and expenses incurred to defend against positions taken against particular parties on particular motions within an action that was, as a whole, substantially justified. In re Interest of A.A. et al., 308 Neb. 749, 957 N.W.2d 138 (2021). A judgment does not become final and appealable until the trial court has ruled upon a pending request for attorney fees made pursuant to state statute. Webb v. Nebraska Dept. of Health & Human Servs., 301 Neb. 810, 920 N.W.2d 268 (2018). A party seeking fees authorized by state law must make a request for such fees prior to a judgment in the cause. Webb v. Nebraska Dept. of Health & Human Servs., 301 Neb. 810, 920 N.W.2d 268 (2018). Attorney fees awarded pursuant to this section are generally treated as an element of court costs, and an award of costs in a judgment is considered a part of the judgment. Webb v. Nebraska Dept. of Health & Human Servs., 301 Neb. 810, 920 N.W.2d 268 (2018). Subsection (1) of this section acts as a limited waiver of the state's sovereign immunity in civil actions brought by the state to the extent that fees and expenses shall be awarded except when the court finds that the position of the State was substantially justified. Action for contempt brought by intervening prospective adoptive parents when Department of Social Services did not comply with unsupervised visitation order issued in an action brought by the department was a suit brought by the State for the purposes of this section. In re Interest of Krystal P. et al., 251 Neb. 320, 557 N.W.2d 26 (1996). The establishment of "substantial justification" for a position under the provisions of this section is dependent upon the circumstances of each case. For the purposes of this section, a position has substantial justification if it has a reasonable basis both in law and in fact. The unsuccessful pursuit of a position by the State does not, in and of itself, establish that the position was not "substantially justified" so as to entitle the prevailing party to the award of fees and other expenses under the provisions of this section. Meier v. State, 227 Neb. 376, 417 N.W.2d 771 (1988). Attorney fees may be awarded under this section only in legal and administrative proceedings initiated after July 17, 1982. Drinkwine v. Flebbe, 219 Neb. 291, 363 N.W.2d 152 (1985).
Nearby Sections
15
§ 25-1001
Attachment; grounds§ 25-1006
Attachment; order; return day§ 25-101
Civil action§ 25-1012
Repealed. Laws 1980, LB 597, § 18§ 25-1012.01
Garnishment; public officers and employeesCite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
Nebraska § 25-1803, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/ne/25-1803.