Nebraska Statutes
§ 25-1556 — Specific exemptions; personal property; selection by debtor; adjustment by Department of Revenue
Nebraska § 25-1556
JurisdictionNebraska
Ch. 25Courts; Civil Procedure
This text of Nebraska § 25-1556 (Specific exemptions; personal property; selection by debtor; adjustment by Department of Revenue) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nebraska primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-1556 (2026).
Text
(1)No property hereinafter mentioned shall be liable to attachment, execution, or sale on any final process issued from any court in this state, against any person being a resident of this state:
(a)The immediate personal possessions of the debtor and his or her family;
(b)all necessary wearing apparel of the debtor and his or her family;
(c)the debtor's interest, not to exceed an aggregate fair market value of three thousand dollars, in household furnishings, household goods, household computers, household appliances, books, or musical instruments which are held primarily for personal, family, or household use of such debtor or the dependents of such debtor;
(d)the debtor's interest, not to exceed an aggregate fair market value of five thousand dollars, in implements, tools, or profe
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Matter of Welborne
63 B.R. 23 (D. Nebraska, 1986)
Matter of Nachtigal
82 B.R. 533 (D. Nebraska, 1988)
Matter of Burchard
214 B.R. 494 (D. Nebraska, 1997)
State v. Bundy
549 N.W.2d 122 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1996)
First National Bank of Wahoo v. Plihal
136 B.R. 810 (D. Nebraska, 1989)
In Re Miller
255 B.R. 221 (D. Nebraska, 2000)
Matter of Knox
169 B.R. 62 (D. Nebraska, 1994)
Matter of Scrams
172 B.R. 297 (D. Nebraska, 1994)
Plihal v. First National Bank of Wahoo (In Re Plihal)
97 B.R. 554 (D. Nebraska, 1989)
ARL CREDIT SERVICES, INC. v. Piper
736 N.W.2d 771 (Nebraska Court of Appeals, 2007)
In re Dana
136 B.R. 813 (D. Nebraska, 1990)
In re Heimbouch
246 B.R. 895 (D. Nebraska, 2000)
In Re Karaus
276 B.R. 227 (D. Nebraska, 2002)
In Re Vasina
337 B.R. 684 (D. Nebraska, 2006)
James Francis Farrell
(D. Nebraska, 2019)
Legislative History
Source: R.S.1867, Code § 530, p. 485; R.S.1913, § 8103; C.S.1922, § 9039; C.S.1929, § 20-1557; R.S.1943, § 25-1556; Laws 1969, c. 187, § 1, p. 778; Laws 1973, LB 16, § 2; Laws 1977, LB 60, § 2; Laws 1997, LB 372, § 2; Laws 2018, LB105, § 2.
Cross References: For other provisions for exempting burial lots and mausoleums, see sections 12-517, 12-520, and 12-605.
Annotations: 1. Who may claim exemptions 2. Property exempt 1. Who may claim exemptions A widow is not entitled to claim all farm machinery as exempt. Thomas v. Sternhagen, 178 Neb. 578, 134 N.W.2d 237 (1965). Only residents and heads of families are entitled; physicians, attorneys, and other professional men, not heads of families, are not entitled to exemption. Howells State Bank v. Arps, 117 Neb. 110, 219 N.W. 844 (1928). Debtor may also claim benefits of other statutes allowing specific exemptions. Johnson v. Bartek, 56 Neb. 422, 76 N.W. 878 (1898). Debtor may make selection. Conway v. Roberts, 38 Neb. 456, 56 N.W. 980 (1893). Where husband absconds, wife may claim benefit of statute. Frazier v. Syas, 10 Neb. 115, 4 N.W. 934 (1880). 2. Property exempt A combine exceeding the value of fifty dollars is not exempt to one engaged in agriculture. Miller v. Dixon, 176 Neb. 659, 127 N.W.2d 203 (1964). Property is specifically exempted under this section, irrespective of homestead exemption, and need not be appraised. Johnson v. Bartek, 56 Neb. 422, 76 N.W. 878 (1898). Growing crops are personal property. Sims v. Jones, 54 Neb. 769, 75 N.W. 150 (1898). Library of lawyer is not exempt where judgment is for money collected for client. Shreck v. Gilbert, 52 Neb. 813, 73 N.W. 276 (1897). Exempt property is not subject to fraudulent alienation. Bloedorn v. Jewell, 34 Neb. 649, 52 N.W. 367 (1892). Homestead exemption does not bar claim under this section. Axtell v. Warden, 7 Neb. 182 (1878). Team of mules instead of horses may be claimed. State ex rel. Metz v. Cunningham, 6 Neb. 90 (1877). Term "plow" includes any plow, even though too large for operation by two horses. Clay Center Bank v. McKelvie, 19 F.2d 308 (8th Cir. 1927). Dealer in eggs and poultry, which he buys at farmers' houses and takes to his place of business, is entitled to hold as exempt a horse, harness, wagon and office furniture, scales, coops, etc., necessary to be used in conducting his business. In re Conley, 162 F. 806 (D. Neb. 1907). Truck used by painter in carrying on business was exempt in bankruptcy court. In re Bailey, 172 F.Supp. 925 (D. Neb. 1959). Exemption of truck as tool for carrying on business allowed in bankruptcy court. In re Burden, 83 F.Supp. 416 (D. Neb. 1949).
Nearby Sections
15
§ 25-1001
Attachment; grounds§ 25-1006
Attachment; order; return day§ 25-101
Civil action§ 25-1012
Repealed. Laws 1980, LB 597, § 18§ 25-1012.01
Garnishment; public officers and employeesCite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
Nebraska § 25-1556, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/ne/25-1556.