Nebraska Statutes
§ 23-338 — Illegal contracts; county exempt from liability
Nebraska § 23-338
JurisdictionNebraska
Ch. 23County Government and Officers
This text of Nebraska § 23-338 (Illegal contracts; county exempt from liability) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nebraska primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Neb. Rev. Stat. § 23-338 (2026).
Text
No judgment shall hereafter be rendered by any court against any such county in any action brought to recover for any article, public improvement, material, service or labor contracted for or ordered in contravention of any statutory limitation, or when there are or were no funds legally available at the time, with which to pay for the same, or in the absence of a statute expressly authorizing such contract; Provided, that this section and sections 23-336 and 23-337 may not prevent the repairing of any bridge damaged by sudden casualty, when the county board shall first declare that an emergency exists, and give notice of its intention to repair such damage by at least one publication in some newspaper of general circulation in the county.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Legislative History
Source: Laws 1905, c. 55, § 3, p. 302; R.S.1913, § 1106; C.S.1922, § 1040; C.S.1929, § 26-734; R.S.1943, § 23-338.
Annotations: This section has no application where county has general authority to contract but the power has been irregularly exercised. Capital Bridge Co. v. County of Saunders, 164 Neb. 304, 83 N.W.2d 18 (1957). Contract of county for purchase of road equipment sustained as legal and valid, and judgment thereon was not in contravention of this section. Omaha Road Equipment Co. v. Thurston County, 122 Neb. 35, 238 N.W. 919 (1931). Prohibition of this section does not extend to money paid to precinct assessors for official services. Hiatt v. Tomlinson, 102 Neb. 730, 169 N.W. 270 (1918). Contracts, by which attorney undertakes collection of dormant judgment for county on contingent basis, is not void because it is for contingent fee. Miles v. Cheyenne County, 96 Neb. 703, 148 N.W. 959 (1914). Where question of failure to give notice by publication of intention to repair was raised for first time on appeal, it will not be considered. Standard Bridge Co. v. Kearney County, 95 Neb. 744, 146 N.W. 943 (1914).
Nearby Sections
15
§ 23-1001
Repealed. Laws 1969, c. 138, § 28§ 23-1002
Repealed. Laws 1969, c. 138, § 28§ 23-1003
Repealed. Laws 1969, c. 138, § 28§ 23-1004
Repealed. Laws 1969, c. 138, § 28§ 23-1005
Repealed. Laws 1969, c. 138, § 28§ 23-1006
Repealed. Laws 1969, c. 138, § 28§ 23-1007
Repealed. Laws 1969, c. 138, § 28§ 23-1008
Repealed. Laws 1969, c. 138, § 28§ 23-1009
Repealed. Laws 1969, c. 138, § 28§ 23-101
Counties; corporate name§ 23-102
County seal; use§ 23-103
Powers; how exercised§ 23-104
Powers§ 23-104.01
Agreements; conditions; limitations; powersCite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
Nebraska § 23-338, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/ne/23-338.