Nebraska Statutes
§ 13-911 — Vehicular pursuit by law enforcement officer; liability to third parties; reimbursement
Nebraska § 13-911
JurisdictionNebraska
Ch. 13Cities, Counties, and Other Political Subdivisions
This text of Nebraska § 13-911 (Vehicular pursuit by law enforcement officer; liability to third parties; reimbursement) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nebraska primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Neb. Rev. Stat. § 13-911 (2026).
Text
(1)In case of death, injury, or property damage to any innocent third party proximately caused by the action of a law enforcement officer employed by a political subdivision during vehicular pursuit, damages shall be paid to such third party by the political subdivision employing the officer.
(2)Upon payment by a political subdivision of those damages sustained by an innocent third party, whether upon voluntary settlement or in satisfaction of a judgment, the political subdivision shall be entitled to reimbursement of the amount of damages paid by the political subdivision from each and all of the following sources:
(a)The driver of the fleeing vehicle;
(b)Any organization, including a sole proprietorship, partnership, limited liability company, or corporation, liable for the conduct o
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Allied Mutual Insurance v. City of Lincoln
694 N.W.2d 832 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 2005)
Henery v. City of Omaha
641 N.W.2d 644 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 2002)
Jura v. City of Omaha
727 N.W.2d 735 (Nebraska Court of Appeals, 2007)
Meyer v. State
650 N.W.2d 459 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 2002)
Williams v. City of Omaha
291 Neb. 403 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 2015)
Maclovi-Sierra v. City of Omaha
290 Neb. 443 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 2015)
Perez v. City of Omaha
731 N.W.2d 604 (Nebraska Court of Appeals, 2007)
Reed v. City of Omaha
724 N.W.2d 834 (Nebraska Court of Appeals, 2006)
Fales v. County of Stanton
297 Neb. 41 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 2017)
James Terrell v. Brek Larson
396 F.3d 975 (Eighth Circuit, 2005)
Kirstie Wade v. Pottawattamie County
100 F.4th 991 (Eighth Circuit, 2024)
JAMES TERRELL, AS TRUSTEE FOR THE HEIRS AND NEXT OF KIN OF TALENA TERRELL, — v. BREK ANDREW LARSON SHAWN AARON LONGEN, —
396 F.3d 975 (Eighth Circuit, 2005)
Legislative History
Source: Laws 1981, LB 273, § 31; R.S.Supp.,1982, § 25-21,183; Laws 1984, LB 590, § 2; R.S.Supp.,1986, § 23-2410.01; Laws 1996, LB 952, § 1.
Cross References: Motor vehicle pursuit, law enforcement policy, see section 29-211. Uninsured and Underinsured Motorist Insurance Coverage Act, see section 44-6401.
Annotations: 1. Innocent third party 2. Proximate cause 3. Vehicular pursuit 4. Miscellaneous 1. Innocent third party If during a vehicular pursuit a passenger takes some action that makes him or her become a person sought to be apprehended, the passenger does not remain an innocent third party by virtue of the fact that law enforcement began the pursuit to apprehend the driver only. Fales v. County of Stanton, 297 Neb. 41, 898 N.W.2d 352 (2017). Under subsection (1) of this section, a political subdivision is strictly liable for injuries to an “innocent third party” during a vehicular pursuit, regardless of whether the law enforcement officer’s actions were otherwise proper or even necessary. An “innocent third party” is one who has not promoted, provoked, or persuaded the driver to engage in flight from law enforcement personnel and one who is not sought to be apprehended in the fleeing vehicle. Werner v. County of Platte, 284 Neb. 899, 824 N.W.2d 38 (2012). An "innocent third party" is one who has not promoted, provoked, or persuaded the driver to engage in flight from law enforcement personnel and one who is not sought to be apprehended in the fleeing vehicle. Henery v. City of Omaha, 263 Neb. 700, 641 N.W.2d 644 (2002). A passenger in a fleeing vehicle is not an innocent third party if such passenger either (1) promoted, provoked, or persuaded the driver to engage in flight from law enforcement personnel or (2) is one who is sought to be apprehended in the fleeing vehicle. Jura v. City of Omaha, 15 Neb. App. 390, 727 N.W.2d 735 (2007). A police officer's grounds for seeking to apprehend occupants in a vehicular chase situation must have a reasonable basis in the law and facts. Jura v. City of Omaha, 15 Neb. App. 390, 727 N.W.2d 735 (2007). Apprehension can mean to arrest, catch, or detain. Jura v. City of Omaha, 15 Neb. App. 390, 727 N.W.2d 735 (2007). A passenger is not an innocent third party if the passenger either (1) has promoted, provoked, or persuaded the driver to engage in flight from law enforcement personnel or (2) is sought to be apprehended in the fleeing vehicle. Reed v. City of Omaha, 15 Neb. App. 234, 724 N.W.2d 834 (2006). 2. Proximate cause A law enforcement officer's decision and action to terminate a vehicular pursuit do not instantaneously eliminate the danger to innocent third parties contemplated in this section. That danger continues until the motorist reasonably perceives that the pursuit has ended and has had an opportunity to discontinue the hazardous, evasive driving behaviors contemplated in this section. Staley v. City of Omaha, 271 Neb. 543, 713 N.W.2d 457 (2006). Whether an injury to an innocent third party is "proximately caused by the action of a law enforcement officer... during vehicular pursuit" is a question of fact which must necessarily be determined on a case-by-case basis. Staley v. City of Omaha, 271 Neb. 543, 713 N.W.2d 457 (2006). In order for a city to be liable for injuries under this section, the first requirement is that the act of the police in pursuing a fleeing motorist must be such that without it the injury would not have occurred, commonly known as the "but for" rule, and the second requirement is that the injury must be the natural and probable result of that act and without an efficient intervening cause. Mid Century Ins. Co. v. City of Omaha, 242 Neb. 126, 494 N.W.2d 320 (1992). 3. Vehicular pursuit The trial court's finding that prior to a collision, the police officers activated the cruiser's overhead lights and the cruiser was increasing its speed supported the court's conclusion that the officers were making an active attempt to apprehend. Williams v. City of Omaha, 291 Neb. 403, 865 N.W.2d 779 (2015). This section does not apply where there is no active attempt to apprehend the vehicle. Lalley v. City of Omaha, 266 Neb. 893, 670 N.W.2d 327 (2003). Pursuant to subsection (5) of this section, an officer's merely following a vehicle in order to provide information to other officers as to the vehicle's location does not constitute a vehicular pursuit. Perez v. City of Omaha, 15 Neb. App. 502, 731 N.W.2d 604 (2007). 4. Miscellaneous This section has created strict liability on the part of a political subdivision when (1) a claimant suffers death, injury, or property damage; (2) such death, injury, or property damage is proximately caused by the actions of a pursuing law enforcement officer employed by the political subdivision; and (3) the claimant is an innocent third party. Stewart v. City of Omaha, 242 Neb. 240, 494 N.W.2d 130 (1993).
Nearby Sections
15
§ 13-1001
Plans authorized; when; contents§ 13-1002
Cooperation with other states§ 13-1003
Improvement districts§ 13-1004
Management of districts§ 13-1005
Acquisition of property§ 13-1006
Reversion of property§ 13-101
Transferred to section43-1401§ 13-102
Transferred to section43-1402§ 13-103
Transferred to section43-1403§ 13-104
Transferred to section43-1404§ 13-105
Transferred to section43-1405§ 13-106
Transferred to section43-1406§ 13-107
Transferred to section43-1407§ 13-108
Transferred to section43-1408§ 13-109
Transferred to section43-1409Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
Nebraska § 13-911, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/ne/13-911.