North Dakota Statutes
§ 9-07-19 — Uncertainty interpreted against party causing it - Presumption as to cause
North Dakota § 9-07-19
This text of North Dakota § 9-07-19 (Uncertainty interpreted against party causing it - Presumption as to cause) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Dakota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
N.D. Cent. Code § 9-07-19 (2026).
Text
In cases of uncertainty not removed by the preceding rules, the language of a contract
should be interpreted most strongly against the party who caused the uncertainty to exist. The
promisor is presumed to be such party, except in a contract between a public officer or body, as
such, and a private party, and in such case it is presumed that all uncertainty was caused by the
private party.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Northwest G.F. Mutual Insurance Co. v. Norgard
518 N.W.2d 179 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1994)
Hanneman v. Continental Western Insurance Co.
1998 ND 46 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1998)
Martin v. Allianz Life Insurance Co. of North America
1998 ND 8 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1998)
Walle Mutual Insurance Co. v. Sweeney
419 N.W.2d 176 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1988)
Oakes Farming Ass'n v. Martinson Bros.
318 N.W.2d 897 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1982)
Stracka v. Peterson
377 N.W.2d 580 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1985)
Kaler v. Kraemer
1999 ND 237 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1999)
City of Bismarck v. Mariner Construction, Inc.
2006 ND 108 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 2006)
Lipp v. Lipp
355 N.W.2d 817 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1984)
Johnson v. Center Mutual Insurance Co.
529 N.W.2d 568 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1995)
Blasi v. Bruin E&P Partners
2021 ND 86 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 2021)
Rolla v. Tank
2013 ND 175 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 2013)
Capital Electric Cooperative, Inc. v. City of Bismarck
2007 ND 128 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 2007)
Dan's Super Market, Inc. v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
38 F.3d 1003 (Eighth Circuit, 1994)
C&C Plumbing and Heating, LLP v. Williams County
2014 ND 128 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 2014)
Markwed Excavating, Inc. v. City of Mandan
2010 ND 220 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 2010)
F.R. of North Dakota, Inc. v. First National Bank of Williston (In Re F.R. of North Dakota, Inc.)
54 B.R. 645 (D. North Dakota, 1985)
Wolsky v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. (In Re Wolsky)
68 B.R. 526 (D. North Dakota, 1986)
Tschider v. Tschider
2019 ND 112 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 2019)
In Re Gateway Investors, Ltd.
113 B.R. 564 (D. North Dakota, 1990)
Nearby Sections
15
§ 9-01-01
Definitions§ 9-01-02
Requisites of contract§ 9-01-04
Joint and several contracts§ 9-01-06
Obligations classified§ 9-01-07
Joint obligation - Presumption§ 9-01-08
Joint obligation - Contribution§ 9-01-09
Conditional obligation defined§ 9-01-11
Condition precedent defined§ 9-01-12
Conditions concurrent defined§ 9-01-13
Condition subsequent defined§ 9-01-14
Conditions unlawful or impossible§ 9-01-15
Forfeiture - InterpretationCite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
North Dakota § 9-07-19, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/nd/9-07-19.