North Dakota Statutes
§ 9-07-18 — Inconsistent words rejected
Words in a contract which are inconsistent with its nature or with the main intention of the
parties are to be rejected.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
North Dakota § 9-07-18 (Inconsistent words rejected) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Meyer v. Hansen
373 N.W.2d 392 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1985)
Langer v. Pender
2009 ND 51 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 2009)
Heitkamp v. Kabella
2019 ND 96 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 2019)
Matter of Michael J. Tharaldson Trust
2023 ND 2 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 2023)
Ottum v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (In Re Trust of Roger S. Linn Restated Trust Agreemen)
2019 ND 58 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 2019)
Axvig v. Czajkowski
2025 ND 135 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 2025)
Guardianship and Conservatorship of G.I.C.
2025 ND 36 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 2025)
Fremling v. Fremling
2009 ND 50 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 2009)
Trust of Linn
2019 ND 58 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 2019)
Nearby Sections
15
§ 9-01-01
Definitions§ 9-01-02
Requisites of contract§ 9-01-04
Joint and several contracts§ 9-01-06
Obligations classified§ 9-01-07
Joint obligation - Presumption§ 9-01-08
Joint obligation - Contribution§ 9-01-09
Conditional obligation defined§ 9-01-11
Condition precedent defined§ 9-01-12
Conditions concurrent defined§ 9-01-13
Condition subsequent defined§ 9-01-14
Conditions unlawful or impossible§ 9-01-15
Forfeiture - Interpretation