North Dakota § 30.1-36-08 Reliance on agreement - Limitation of liability

North Dakota Statutes

§ 30.1-36-08 — Reliance on agreement - Limitation of liability

North Dakota § 30.1-36-08

Title 30.1Uniform Probate Code

Ch. 30.1-36Supported Decisionmaking Agreements

This text of North Dakota § 30.1-36-08 (Reliance on agreement - Limitation of liability) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Dakota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

N.D. Cent. Code § 30.1-36-08 (2026).

Text

1.Any third person who receives a copy of a supported decisionmaking agreement shall rely on the agreement, unless:

a.The third person has cause to believe the named individual is being abused, neglected, or exploited by the supporter;

b.The third person has actual knowledge or notice the supported decisionmaking agreement is invalid; or

c.The third person has actual knowledge or notice the supported decisionmaking agreement has been terminated.

2.A third person is not subject to criminal or civil liability and has not engaged in professional misconduct for an act or omission if the act or omission is done in good faith and in reliance on a supported decisionmaking agreement.

3.An entity, custodian, or organization that discloses personal information about a named individual to a sup

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

1. Any third person who receives a copy of a supported decisionmaking agreement shall
rely on the agreement, unless:
a. The third person has cause to believe the named individual is being abused,
neglected, or exploited by the supporter;
b. The third person has actual knowledge or notice the supported decisionmaking
agreement is invalid; or
c. The third person has actual knowledge or notice the supported decisionmaking
agreement has been terminated.
2. A third person is not subject to criminal or civil liability and has not engaged in
professional misconduct for an act or omission if the act or omission is done in good
faith and in reliance on a supported decisionmaking agreement.
3. An entity, custodian, or organization that discloses personal information about a
named individual to a supporter who has written authorization to access, collect, or
obtain, or to assist a named individual to access, collect, or obtain that information, is
immune from any action alleging the entity, custodian, or organization improperly or
unlawfully disclosed information to the supporter unless:
a. The entity, custodian, or organization had actual knowledge or notice the named
individual had revoked the authorization;
b. The entity, custodian, or organization had actual knowledge or notice the
supported decisionmaking agreement is invalid; or
c. The entity, custodian, or organization knowingly or recklessly disclosed
information beyond the scope of the authorization.
4. A third person is not protected from charges of professional misconduct and is not
immune from liability for:
a. Acting inconsistently with the known expressed wishes of a named individual; or
b. Failing to provide documents, records, or other information to either a named
individual or a supporter who has written authorization for lawful access to or
copies of the information.
5. A supported decisionmaking agreement does not relieve a person of legal obligations
to provide services to an individual with a disability.