North Dakota § 27-10-20 When undertaking ordered prosecuted in name of state - Disposition of moneys collected

North Dakota Statutes

§ 27-10-20 — When undertaking ordered prosecuted in name of state - Disposition of moneys collected

North Dakota § 27-10-20

Title 27Judicial Branch of Government

Ch. 27-10Contempts

This text of North Dakota § 27-10-20 (When undertaking ordered prosecuted in name of state - Disposition of moneys collected) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Dakota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

N.D. Cent. Code § 27-10-20 (2026).

Text

moneys collected.
In an order for the prosecution of an undertaking given for the appearance of a person
accused of contempt, the court, whenever it thinks proper to do so, may, or whenever no party
is aggrieved by the misconduct of the person, shall, direct a prosecution to be made in the name
of this state by the attorney general or by the state's attorney of the county in which the
undertaking was given. In an action brought pursuant to such direction, the state is entitled to
recover the entire sum specified in the undertaking. Out of the money collected, the court which
directed the prosecution must order the person at whose instance a warrant was issued to be
paid such a sum as it thinks proper to satisfy the costs and expenses incurred by the person
and to compensate the person for 

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

moneys collected.
In an order for the prosecution of an undertaking given for the appearance of a person
accused of contempt, the court, whenever it thinks proper to do so, may, or whenever no party
is aggrieved by the misconduct of the person, shall, direct a prosecution to be made in the name
of this state by the attorney general or by the state's attorney of the county in which the
undertaking was given. In an action brought pursuant to such direction, the state is entitled to
recover the entire sum specified in the undertaking. Out of the money collected, the court which
directed the prosecution must order the person at whose instance a warrant was issued to be
paid such a sum as it thinks proper to satisfy the costs and expenses incurred by the person
and to compensate the person for the loss or injury sustained by reason of the misconduct. The
residue of the money must be paid into the treasury of this state to the credit of the school fund.