North Dakota Statutes
§ 27-02-22 — Majority of judges must concur in judgment - Effect if concurrence of majority is lacking
North Dakota § 27-02-22
This text of North Dakota § 27-02-22 (Majority of judges must concur in judgment - Effect if concurrence of majority is lacking) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Dakota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
N.D. Cent. Code § 27-02-22 (2026).
Text
majority is lacking.
The concurrence of a majority of the judges of the supreme court is necessary to pronounce
judgment. If a majority does not concur, the case must be reheard, but no more than two
rehearings may be had. If on the second rehearing a majority of the judges does not concur, the
judgment must be affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Goff v. Goff
1999 ND 95 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1999)
Security National Bank, Edgeley v. Wald
536 N.W.2d 924 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1995)
Nearby Sections
15
§ 27-01-05
Expenses on change of venue§ 27-01-06
Payment of expenses on change of venue§ 27-01-07
Civil action fees - Waiver§ 27-01-09
Reciprocal recognition of certain state and tribal court judgments, decrees, and orders - Conditions§ 27-02-02
Salaries of justices of supreme court§ 27-02-03
Stenographers for supreme courtCite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
North Dakota § 27-02-22, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/nd/27-02-22.