§ 2-04-11 — Judicial review

1. Any person aggrieved, or taxpayer affected, by any decision of a board of adjustment,
or any governing body of a political subdivision or any joint airport zoning board which
is of the opinion that a decision of a board of adjustment is illegal, may present to the

district court a verified petition setting forth that the decision is illegal, in whole or in
part, and specifying the grounds of the illegality. Such petition must be presented to
the court within fifteen days after the decision is filed in the office of the board.
2. Upon presentation of such petition the court may allow a writ of certiorari directed to
the board of adjustment to review such a decision of the board. The allowance of the
writ does not stay proceedings upon the decision appealed from, but the court may, on
application, on notice to the board and on due cause shown, grant a restraining order.
3. The board of adjustment is not required to return the original papers acted upon by it,
but it is sufficient to return certified or sworn copies thereof or of such portions thereof
as may be called for by the writ. The return must concisely set forth such other facts as
may be pertinent and material to show the grounds of the decision appealed from and
must be verified.
4. The court has exclusive jurisdiction to affirm, modify, or set aside the decision brought
up for review, in whole or in part, and if need be, to order further proceedings by the
board of adjustment. The findings of fact of the board, if supported by substantial
evidence, must be accepted by the court as conclusive, and no objection to a decision
of the board may be considered by the court unless such objection has been urged
before the board, or, if it was not so urged, unless there were reasonable grounds for
failure to do so.
5. Costs may not be allowed against the board of adjustment unless it appears to the
court that it acted with gross negligence, in bad faith, or with malice, in making the
decision appealed from.
6. In any case in which airport zoning regulations adopted under this chapter, although
generally reasonable, are held by a court to interfere with the use or enjoyment of a
particular structure or parcel of land to such an extent, or to be so onerous in their
application to such a structure or parcel of land, as to constitute a taking or deprivation
of that property in violation of the Constitution of North Dakota or the Constitution of
the United States, such holding does not affect the application of such regulations to
other structures and parcels of land.