Missouri Statutes

§ 99.825 — Adoption of ordinance for redevelopment, public hearing required — objection procedure — hearing and notices not required, when — restrictions on certain projects — submission to state auditor and department of revenue.

Missouri § 99.825
JurisdictionMissouri
Title VIICITIES, TOWNS AND VILLAGES
Ch. 99Municipal Housing

This text of Missouri § 99.825 (Adoption of ordinance for redevelopment, public hearing required — objection procedure — hearing and notices not required, when — restrictions on certain projects — submission to state auditor and department of revenue.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mo. Rev. Stat. § 99.825 (2026).

Text

1.Prior to the adoption of an ordinance proposing the designation of a redevelopment area, or approving a redevelopment plan or redevelopment project, the commission shall fix a time and place for a public hearing as required in subsection 4 of section 99.820 and notify each taxing district located wholly or partially within the boundaries of the proposed redevelopment area, plan or project.  At the public hearing any interested person or affected taxing district may file with the commission written objections to, or comments on, and may be heard orally in respect to, any issues embodied in the notice.  The commission shall hear and consider all protests, objections, comments and other evidence presented at the hearing.  The hearing may be continued to another date without further notice

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Legislative History

(L. 1982 H.B. 1411 & 1587 § 4, A.L. 1986 S.B. 664 merged with H.B. 989 & 1390, A.L. 1991 H.B. 502, A.L. 1997 2d Ex. Sess. S.B. 1, A.L. 2007 H.B. 741, A.L. 2008 H.B. 2058 merged with S.B. 718, A.L. 2016 H.B. 1434 & 1600, A.L. 2022 H.B. 1606) *Revisor's Note:  This section was declared unconstitutional in Byrd, et al. v. State of Missouri, et al. (see 2023 annotation below). (2023) The inclusion of Section 67.2300 in H.B. 1606 from 2022 declared unconstitutional as violating the single subject rule of Article III, § 23 of the Missouri Constitution.  The remaining provisions of H.B. 1606 could not be severed and the bill is declared invalid in its entirety.  Byrd, et al. v. State of Missouri, et al., 679 S.W.3d 492 (Mo.banc).

Nearby Sections

15
View on official source ↗

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Missouri § 99.825, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/mo/99/99.825.