Missouri Statutes

§ 513.607 — Property subject to forfeiture — procedure — report required, when, contents — annual state auditor's report, contents — violations, penalty.

Missouri § 513.607
JurisdictionMissouri
Title XXXVCIVIL PROCEDURE AND LIMITATIONS
Ch. 513Executions and Exemptions

This text of Missouri § 513.607 (Property subject to forfeiture — procedure — report required, when, contents — annual state auditor's report, contents — violations, penalty.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mo. Rev. Stat. § 513.607 (2026).

Text

1.All property of every kind, including cash or other negotiable instruments, used or intended for use in the course of, derived from, or realized through criminal activity is subject to civil forfeiture.  Civil forfeiture shall be had by a civil procedure known as a CAFA forfeiture proceeding.
2.A CAFA forfeiture proceeding shall be governed by the Missouri rules of court, rules of civil procedure, except to the extent that special rules of procedure are stated herein.
3.Any property seized by a law enforcement officer or agent shall not be disposed of pursuant to section 542.301 or by the uniform disposition of unclaimed property act, sections 447.500 through 447.595 , unless the CAFA proceeding involving the seized property does not result in a judgment of forfeiture.
4.In ca

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Legislative History

(L. 1986 S.B. 450 § 6, A.L. 1993 S.B. 180, A.L. 2001 S.B. 5 & 21) (1990) Forfeiture provisions of the drug statutes are manifestly penal laws in the sense of art. IX, sec. 7, Mo. const. and the proceeds are available for school purposes only, rather than to law enforcement agency. Reorganized School District No. 7 Lafayette County v. Douthit, 799 S.W.2d 591 (Mo.banc). (2000) Seizure occurred when city police stopped and arrested claimant for traffic violations and took possession of money found in car; divestment of claimant's possessory interests occurred at that point and not when money was transferred to federal agents. Also, transfer was improper without first obtaining approval from circuit judge and prosecutor.  Karpierz v. Easley, 31 S.W.3d 505 (Mo.App.W.D.).

Nearby Sections

15
View on official source ↗

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Missouri § 513.607, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/mo/513/513.607.