Missouri Statutes

§ 511.760 — Uniform enforcement of foreign judgments law.

Missouri § 511.760
JurisdictionMissouri
Title XXXVCIVIL PROCEDURE AND LIMITATIONS
Ch. 511Judgments

This text of Missouri § 511.760 (Uniform enforcement of foreign judgments law.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mo. Rev. Stat. § 511.760 (2026).

Text

1.  The following terms as used in this section shall mean:

(1)"Foreign judgment" , any judgment, decree or order of a court of the United States or of any state or territory which is entitled to full faith and credit in this state;
(2)"Judgment debtor" , the party against whom a foreign judgment has been rendered;
(3)"Levy" , to take control of or create a lien upon property under any judicial writ or process whereby satisfaction of a judgment may be enforced against such property;
(4)"Register" , to file and record a foreign judgment in a court of this state. 2.  On application made within the time allowed for bringing an action on a foreign judgment in this state, any person entitled to bring such action may have a foreign judgment registered in any court of this state having j

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Legislative History

(L. 1951 p. 358 §§ 1 to 18) (1974) "Supplemental judgment" purporting to make an original judgment for alimony final which did not give husband notice or opportunity for hearing violated husband's right to due process. Overman v. Overman (A.), 514 S.W.2d 625. (1974) Held this section not unconstitutional as denying defendant due process of law by depriving him of property prior to hearing on validity of underlying claim. Bittner v. Butts (Mo.), 514 S.W.2d 556. (1976) In proceedings by judgment creditor, under Illinois summary judgment law, to enforce judgment, held that defendant's allegation that judgment was based on affidavit containing fraudulent misstatements alleged only intrinsic fraud and was not sufficient to authorize equitable relief against enforcement of judgment under Illinois law and therefore full faith and credit clause precluded any such collateral inquiry by a Missouri Court. Young Electric, Inc. v. Susman (A.), 533 S.W.2d 625. (1976) Held, a foreign judgment may be attacked for lack of jurisdiction over the subject matter, failure to give due notice and fraud in the procurement of jurisdiction. These are the attacks that can be made at the time of application for registration of the foreign judgment. Corning Truck and Radiator Service v. J.W.M., Inc. (A.), 542 S.W.2d 520. (1976) Held, to vitiate a foreign judgment on grounds of fraud in the procurement it must be shown that the fraud was extrinsic or collateral to the issues tried. Intrinsic fraud is unavailing.  Mekelburg v. Whitman (A.), 545 S.W.2d 89.

Nearby Sections

15
View on official source ↗

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Missouri § 511.760, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/mo/511.760.