Michigan Statutes

§ 800.404 — Exclusive jurisdiction of circuit court; complaint; order to show cause; hearing; order requiring reimbursement; amount; obligation of defendant to support dependents; neglect or refusal to comply with order; contempt; liability of assets; time limitations.

Michigan § 800.404
JurisdictionMichigan
Ch. 800PRISONS
Act 253 of 1935THE STATE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY REIMBURSEMENT ACT (800.401-800.407)

This text of Michigan § 800.404 (Exclusive jurisdiction of circuit court; complaint; order to show cause; hearing; order requiring reimbursement; amount; obligation of defendant to support dependents; neglect or refusal to comply with order; contempt; liability of assets; time limitations.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mich. Comp. Laws § 800.404 (2026).

Text

THE STATE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY REIMBURSEMENT ACT (EXCERPT) Act 253 of 1935 800.404 Exclusive jurisdiction of circuit court; complaint; order to show cause; hearing; order requiring reimbursement; amount; obligation of defendant to support dependents; neglect or refusal to comply with order; contempt; liability of assets; time limitations. Sec. 4.

(1)The circuit court shall have exclusive jurisdiction over all proceedings under this act. The attorney general may file a complaint in the circuit court for the county from which a prisoner was sentenced, stating that the person is or has been a prisoner in a state correctional facility, that there is good cause to believe that the prisoner has assets, and praying that the assets be used to reimburse the state for the expenses incurred or to b

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Legislative History

1935, Act 253, Imd. Eff. June 8, 1935 ;-- CL 1948, 800.404 ;-- Am. 1984, Act 282, Imd. Eff. Dec. 20, 1984 Constitutionality: The Prison Reimbursement Act was intended to apply to all inmates of the state penal system and was not limited to the inmates of the three penal institutions named in the act and in existence at the time of its passage; nor is the act violative of the constitutional guarantee of equal protection. State Treasurer v Wilson, 423 Mich 138; 347 NW2d 770 (1985).

Nearby Sections

15
View on official source ↗

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Michigan § 800.404, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/mi/800/800.404.