Michigan § 408.1119 Retaliatory acts; complaint; rebuttable presumption.

Michigan Statutes

§ 408.1119 — Retaliatory acts; complaint; rebuttable presumption.

Michigan § 408.1119

Ch. 408LABOR

Act 10 of 2023PREVAILING WAGES ON STATE PROJECTS (408.1101-408.1126)

This text of Michigan § 408.1119 (Retaliatory acts; complaint; rebuttable presumption.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mich. Comp. Laws § 408.1119 (2026).

Text

PREVAILING WAGES ON STATE PROJECTS (EXCERPT) Act 10 of 2023 408.1119 Retaliatory acts; complaint; rebuttable presumption. Sec.

19.An employee who believes they have been discharged, disciplined, or otherwise experienced a detrimental change in their employment status due to filing a complaint, participating in an investigation, or having raised concerns with their payment of wages and fringe benefits covered by this act with their employer, may file a complaint with the commissioner not later than 90 days after the believed retaliatory act. There is a rebuttable presumption of retaliation if an employee was removed from the project or not provided similar overtime, work hours, or other opportunities available prior to the retaliatory action. If the commissioner determines that retaliation

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PREVAILING WAGES ON STATE PROJECTS (EXCERPT) Act 10 of 2023 408.1119 Retaliatory acts; complaint; rebuttable presumption. Sec. 19. An employee who believes they have been discharged, disciplined, or otherwise experienced a detrimental change in their employment status due to filing a complaint, participating in an investigation, or having raised concerns with their payment of wages and fringe benefits covered by this act with their employer, may file a complaint with the commissioner not later than 90 days after the believed retaliatory act. There is a rebuttable presumption of retaliation if an employee was removed from the project or not provided similar overtime, work hours, or other opportunities available prior to the retaliatory action. If the commissioner determines that retaliation has occurred, the commissioner may order rehiring, reinstatement, or other equitable remedy, including full back pay or lost earnings as a result of the retaliatory act.