Maine § 17-A §2005 Criteria for restitution

Maine Statutes

§ 17-A §2005 — Criteria for restitution

Maine § 17-A §2005

Title 17-AMAINE CRIMINAL CODE

Part 6PUNISHMENTS

Ch. 69RESTITUTION

This text of Maine § 17-A §2005 (Criteria for restitution) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 17-A, § 17-A §2005 (2026).

Text

1.Restitution authorized. Restitution may be authorized, in whole or in part, as compensation for economic loss. In determining the amount of restitution authorized, the following must be considered:

2.Restitution not authorized. Restitution is not authorized:

3.Exception. The provisions of subsection 2, paragraph D do not apply to an offender that is an organization.

4.Burdens of proof. An offender who asserts a present or future incapacity to pay restitution has the burden of proving the incapacity by a preponderance of the evidence. On appeal of a restitution order, the offender has the burden of demonstrating that the incapacity was proven as a matter of law.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

1.
Restitution authorized.
Restitution may be authorized, in whole or in part, as compensation for economic loss. In determining the amount of restitution authorized, the following must be considered:
2.
Restitution not authorized.
Restitution is not authorized:
3.
Exception.
The provisions of subsection 2, paragraph D do not apply to an offender that is an organization.
4.
Burdens of proof.
An offender who asserts a present or future incapacity to pay restitution has the burden of proving the incapacity by a preponderance of the evidence. On appeal of a restitution order, the offender has the burden of demonstrating that the incapacity was proven as a matter of law.