Maine § 15 §1099 Grounds for revocation of post-conviction bail

Maine Statutes

§ 15 §1099 — Grounds for revocation of post-conviction bail

Maine § 15 §1099

Title 15COURT PROCEDURE -- CRIMINAL

Part 2PROCEEDINGS BEFORE TRIAL

Ch. 105-AMAINE BAIL CODE

This text of Maine § 15 §1099 (Grounds for revocation of post-conviction bail) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 15, § 15 §1099 (2026).

Text

An order of post-conviction bail entered by a judge or justice may be revoked by the judge or justice or, if that judge or justice is not available, by another judge or justice of the same court, upon determination made after notice and opportunity for hearing that:

1.Crime charged. The defendant has in fact been charged with a crime allegedly committed after post-conviction bail was set;

2.Failure to appear. The defendant has failed to appear as required or has violated a condition of post-conviction bail as demonstrated by a preponderance of the evidence; or

3.Appeal for purposes of delay. The defendant's appeal has been taken for the purpose of delay as demonstrated by a preponderance of the evidence.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

An order of post-conviction bail entered by a judge or justice may be revoked by the judge or justice or, if that judge or justice is not available, by another judge or justice of the same court, upon determination made after notice and opportunity for hearing that:
1.
Crime charged.
The defendant has in fact been charged with a crime allegedly committed after post-conviction bail was set;
2.
Failure to appear.
The defendant has failed to appear as required or has violated a condition of post-conviction bail as demonstrated by a preponderance of the evidence; or
3.
Appeal for purposes of delay.
The defendant's appeal has been taken for the purpose of delay as demonstrated by a preponderance of the evidence.