Indiana Statutes
§ 9-30-6-2 — Probable cause; offer of test; alternative tests; requirement to submit
Indiana·Title 9 MOTOR VEHICLES·Art. 30 GENERAL PENALTY PROVISIONS·Ch. 6 Implied Consent; Administrative and Evidentiary Matters
(a)A law enforcement officer who has probable
cause to believe that a person has committed an offense under this
chapter, IC 9-30-5, or IC 9-30-9, or a violation under IC 9-30-15 shall
offer the person the opportunity to submit to a chemical test.
(b)A law enforcement officer:
(1)is not required to offer a chemical test to an unconscious
person; and
(2)may offer a person more than one (1) chemical test under this
chapter.
(c)A test administered under this chapter must be administered
within three (3) hours after the law enforcement officer had probable
cause to believe the person committed an offense under IC 9-30-5 or
a violation under IC 9-30-15.
(d)A person must submit to each chemical test offered by a law
enforcement officer in order to comply with the implied consent
provisions
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Indiana § 9-30-6-2 (Probable cause; offer of test; alternative tests; requirement to submit) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Schmidt v. State
816 N.E.2d 925 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 2004)
Mullins v. State
646 N.E.2d 40 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1995)
Dannie Carl Pattison v. State of Indiana
54 N.E.3d 361 (Indiana Supreme Court, 2016)
Ham v. State
826 N.E.2d 640 (Indiana Supreme Court, 2005)
Datzek v. State
838 N.E.2d 1149 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 2005)
Ballinger v. State
717 N.E.2d 939 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1999)
Weida v. State
693 N.E.2d 598 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1998)
Brown v. State
774 N.E.2d 1001 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 2002)
Abney v. State
811 N.E.2d 415 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 2004)
Barber v. State
911 N.E.2d 641 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 2009)
Dawson v. State
612 N.E.2d 580 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1993)
Dalton v. State
773 N.E.2d 332 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 2002)
Hartman v. State
615 N.E.2d 455 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1993)
Duncan v. State
799 N.E.2d 538 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 2003)
State v. Albright
622 N.E.2d 995 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1993)
Ham v. State
810 N.E.2d 1150 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 2004)
Monjar v. State
876 N.E.2d 792 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 2007)
Minix v. State
726 N.E.2d 848 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 2000)
Cohee v. State
945 N.E.2d 748 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 2011)
Kristy Burnell v. State of Indiana
44 N.E.3d 771 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 2015)
Legislative History
As added by P.L.2-1991, SEC.18. Amended by P.L.53-1994,
SEC.7.
Nearby Sections
15
§ 9-13-0.1-1
P.L.2-1991 codification; no effect on rights, liabilities, penalties,
violations, or proceedings; references§ 9-13-1-1
Application of definitions§ 9-13-1-2
Inapplication of article to IC 9-28§ 9-13-1-3
Repealed§ 9-13-1-4
References to federal statutes or regulations relating to the National
Voter Registration Act§ 9-13-2-0.1
Repealed§ 9-13-2-1
"Abandoned vehicle"§ 9-13-2-1.1
Repealed§ 9-13-2-1.2
Repealed§ 9-13-2-1.3
Repealed§ 9-13-2-1.4
"Adapted vehicle"§ 9-13-2-1.5
Repealed§ 9-13-2-1.6
"Advisory board"§ 9-13-2-1.7
"Aggressive driving"