Indiana Statutes
§ 33-28-3-5 — Exceptions to formal practice and procedure; answer and appearance; continuance; informality
(a)The exceptions provided in this section to
formal practice and procedure apply to all cases on the small claims
docket.
(b)A defendant is considered to have complied with the statute and
rule requiring the filing of an answer upon entering an appearance
personally or by attorney. The appearance constitutes a general denial
and preserves all defenses and compulsory counterclaims, which may
then be presented at the trial of the case.
(c)If, at the trial of the case, the court determines:
(1)that the complaint is so vague or ambiguous that the defendant
was unable to determine the nature of the plaintiff's claim; or
(2)that the plaintiff is surprised by a defense or compulsory
counterclaim raised by the defendant that the plaintiff could not
reasonably have anticipated;
the court shal
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Indiana § 33-28-3-5 (Exceptions to formal practice and procedure; answer and appearance; continuance; informality) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Heather Herren v. Jerry Dishman
1 N.E.3d 697 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 2013)
Austin White v. Jessamyn Rhymer
(Indiana Court of Appeals, 2012)
Legislative History
As added by P.L.98-2004, SEC.7.
Nearby Sections
15
§ 33-22-1-1
"Prior law" defined§ 33-22-1-2
Purpose of recodification§ 33-22-1-3
Statutory construction of recodification§ 33-22-1-4
Effect of recodification§ 33-22-1-5
Recodification of prior law§ 33-22-1-6
References to repealed statutes§ 33-22-1-7
References to citations§ 33-22-1-8
References to prior rules§ 33-22-1-9
References to prior law§ 33-23-1-1
Application§ 33-23-1-10
Offense§ 33-23-1-10.5
"User fee"§ 33-23-1-11
Vacancy§ 33-23-1-2
Chairperson§ 33-23-1-3
Commission on judicial qualifications